Lol I hope you are just trolling.
[citation][nom]TA152H[/nom]Their OS will not get faster, it will get slower like it always has. They have been known for bloatware for decades now, and it's not going to change.They don't have the programming skill to do it. So, they use smoke and mirrors to make things "appear" faster, when they're slower.In fact, most people think Windows 7 is faster than the dreadfully slow Vista. It's slower, when benchmarked.Windows 8 will be slower still.[/citation]
Windows 7 IS faster than Vista, and a lot more stable. And what do you mean smoke and mirrors? There are some reasons that make Windows easier to use and more portable and backwards compatible which also slow down performance. I hope that Windows drops the layers of compatibility for a cleaner slate and potentially faster and lighterweight operating system.
[citation] Microsloth will just fool us, because we're stupid, after all, and put the computer in hibernate mode so it seems faster. We don't care at all that this uses more electricity than powering off the machine, do we? They don't, they don't think we'll notice it enough to realize they are costing us money every month, and will actually like them more for it. So, yes, we'll like Microsoft more, and have more loyalty to them for not having the programming talent to make the operating system boot fast enough, without using constant electricity refreshing memory. Thanks![/citation]
I believe you have hibernate-to-ram (aka sleeping) and hibernate-to-disk confused. Microsoft isn't fooling anyone. If you store data in volatile memory that needs to be refreshed to maintain charge, then you have to use power... Not even whatever OS you think is better can change the hardware functionallity. (I hope you are a troll and really did know that DDR memory needs to be refreshed, windoze or not.)