Wireless Carriers Leave Millions of Android Phones Prone to Hackers

Status
Not open for further replies.

wildkitten

Distinguished
May 29, 2008
816
0
18,980
0
This has been one of the most frustrating things being an Android owner. The ridiculousness of the manufacturer having to submit build after build is outrageous. Verizon made Motorola submit at least 10 ICS builds for the Bionic before one ever got approved, and it wasn't because of how well the builds were but fights over bloatware and what could be frozen without root.

This is one thing Apple does right with the iPhone. Google needs to push their weight around with carriers in support of their OEM's.
 

wildkitten

Distinguished
May 29, 2008
816
0
18,980
0
[citation][nom]Moesfury[/nom]Yet, another reason to root your phone[/citation]
A person whouldnt have to risk bricking their phone, voiding their warranty, increasing the cost of service only to get timely upgrades.

Rooting should be done by enthusiasts, not seen as something the average typical user should do.
 

sacre

Distinguished
Jul 13, 2006
379
0
18,780
0
All OS's have their downfalls. iPhone is safe, but not really customizable. Android is customizable, but not very safe. "Oh but you can this and that" well you shouldn't have too.
 

InvalidError

Titan
Moderator
If carriers get hit by a handful of class-action lawsuits for billing usage generated by malware that should have been prevented by OS upgrades carriers never rolled out and that end-users could not install themselves due to DMCA, with courts telling carriers refund and eat future usage costs until they fix their phones, things may start moving more quickly.

If carriers refuse to update phones and refuse to let susbcribers update their own phones, carriers should be responsible for malware data usage since this effectively means carriers refuse to do the minimum effort required to reduce the likelihood of malware getting on their devices.
 

shadowfamicom

Honorable
May 2, 2012
136
0
10,680
0
[citation][nom]sacre[/nom]All OS's have their downfalls. iPhone is safe, but not really customizable. Android is customizable, but not very safe. "Oh but you can this and that" well you shouldn't have too.[/citation]

That's why there needs to be a middle of the road OS, something that is more controlled then Android, but less controlled then iOS. Finding a way to standardize more internal hardware would help things rollout faster maybe? Or maybe make it so Samsung, Motorola, HTC, ect can all give you updates by plugging into your computer, bypassing the carrier crap they go through. I am sure this is against the contracts phone makers sign though.
Anyone correct me if I am wrong :)
 

Gundam288

Distinguished
Sep 23, 2011
281
0
18,790
2
[citation][nom]otacon72[/nom]It will NEVER happen because of the ToS you agreed to when you signed up for your plan.[/citation]
A ToS doesn't always mean you are off the hook in court.
 

tului

Distinguished
Aug 20, 2010
193
0
18,680
0
[citation][nom]Gundam288[/nom]A ToS doesn't always mean you are off the hook in court.[/citation]
I agree. Our congress critters are also free to pass legislation making carriers liable. You know, it'd be nice if they did something actually useful.
 

InvalidError

Titan
Moderator
[citation][nom]otacon72[/nom]It will NEVER happen because of the ToS you agreed to when you signed up for your plan.[/citation]
Companies put tons of crap in their contracts, ToS, etc. that does not hold water in court or gets abused in ways that courts may rule unconscionable - clauses that courts rule no sane person would accept unless they were forced to or otherwise had little to no other choice.

IIRC, the arbitration clause many carriers put in their contracts to dissuade people from taking carriers to court got struck down a couple of times by judges saying such clauses are anti-constitutional and therefore void.
 

The_Trutherizer

Distinguished
Jul 21, 2008
509
0
18,980
0
After my experience with trying to get an OS upgrade for my Motorola Defy I honestly believe that many HW manufacturers want consumers to buy a new device rather than just giving them software updates. Well at the very least their priorities seem to be aligned that way. Personally I see it as a fail that my device couldn't install the latest OS 1.5 years after being released into the market and I would see more care being taken by the manufacturers to ensure that their products remain valid for at least a few years able to provide their customers with a viable user experience throughout. It's not like my Defy was a low end phone when it came out. It had some very decent hardware for the time.
 

siddallj

Distinguished
May 26, 2011
14
0
18,510
0
If you want the latest OS on Android, Root your phone.
Install a custom ROM
Cyanogen Mod 10.1 is Extremely good. Faster, longer battery life.
Then add Comodo Antivirus, your covered.
Latest OS, great security.
 

house70

Splendid
The openness of the OS is well worth the minimal security risk. I don't want a phone that tries to protect me from myself and thinks it knows better.
To each his/her own.
If you want to keep your secure settings, don't change the default developer options and don't install apps that require more privileges than they should. Rooting actually decreases your security a bit because it gives you access and control over the system partition and the OS files. It should only be done if you really know what you're doing.
If your device works as intended with an older OS version, just keep it. Why force an update that will make it worse in case the hardware can't keep up with it? Apple is crippling their older devices by doing this, no need to join that trend.
Finally, if you really have to do it, research a lot before jumping in.
 

toadhammer

Distinguished
Nov 2, 2012
115
3
18,685
0
[citation][nom]dark_wizzie[/nom]Why don't carriers do the updates? It ups the experience and its beneficial to them...[/citation]
After launch, hardware makers don't want the cost of redoing their custom work (mating android to their hardware and drivers). Similar story for the carriers. Only nexus has vanilla android.
It's all about the money. Spending money isn't beneficial to them if they don't think it will buy them something valuable.
 
G

Guest

Guest
What people understand is you have to ROOT your device to avoid this. I can get any update I want or any Google ROM out there without having to depend on the manufacturer. The main fault here is on Google for allowing the cellular companies to have main control of when the users can get the updates on the stock ROM. Apple proves to be the strongest company to have control over their devices. They do not allow custom operating systems on the iDevices, no cellular service branding (seeing AT&T or Verizon on the phone), and things of that nature. Google should provide service to where they install the STOCK ANDROID ROM and have main control through Google other than the cellular provider.
 

g00fysmiley

Distinguished
Apr 30, 2010
2,175
0
19,860
37
[citation][nom]biohazrdfear[/nom]What people understand is you have to ROOT your device to avoid this. I can get any update I want or any Google ROM out there without having to depend on the manufacturer. The main fault here is on Google for allowing the cellular companies to have main control of when the users can get the updates on the stock ROM. Apple proves to be the strongest company to have control over their devices. They do not allow custom operating systems on the iDevices, no cellular service branding (seeing AT&T or Verizon on the phone), and things of that nature. Google should provide service to where they install the STOCK ANDROID ROM and have main control through Google other than the cellular provider.[/citation]

agreed but i would add farther that phone makers like htc and samsung have little reason to update a phone either, my wife's rooted samsung should still eb on 2.3 but instead has 4.0, my buddy's htc evo could also run 4.0 but because he is not willign to root he will never get 4.0 or higher, his phone could easily run it but even htc never released the drivers for it because they want people to buy a new device
 

wildkitten

Distinguished
May 29, 2008
816
0
18,980
0
[citation][nom]biohazrdfear[/nom]What people understand is you have to ROOT your device to avoid this. I can get any update I want or any Google ROM out there without having to depend on the manufacturer. The main fault here is on Google for allowing the cellular companies to have main control of when the users can get the updates on the stock ROM. Apple proves to be the strongest company to have control over their devices. They do not allow custom operating systems on the iDevices, no cellular service branding (seeing AT&T or Verizon on the phone), and things of that nature. Google should provide service to where they install the STOCK ANDROID ROM and have main control through Google other than the cellular provider.[/citation]
Once again, rooting needs to stop being pushed as something typical. Rooting should only be done by those who know exactly what they are doing, are willing to brick their phones, are willing to accept the voiding of the warranty and accept possibly paying more for technical support as well as be willing to pay full price for a replacement phone if something goes wrong.

In the case of installing a custom ROM, yes, that is all great for the tinkerer, but it is awful advice for someone who depends on their phone. There is also the issue that this takes you off the upgrade path. This may be fine for merely OS upgrades, however, it is not always upgrades that get pushed. If a carrier makes changes to their network that changes how the phone and the network interact, they have to push out an update for that, and if you have a custom ROM, you don't get it.

I'm not saying there is something wrong with rooting in and of itself, but the problem comes in when people say to do it casually as if it's no different then turning your phone on and never talk about the potential risks and downsides. Read any responsible Android site and they point out the benefits AND the pitfalls of rooting as well as custom ROMs.
 

danwat1234

Distinguished
Jun 13, 2008
1,392
0
19,310
9
So does this mean little security patches need to be approved by carriers? I know OS upgrades need carrier approval. What about 3rd party app updates, I assume those updates are available immediately after the software developer submits the patch.

We need some details.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY