BOE teases the company’s 27-inch 1080p monitor with a 500 Hz refresh rate and 1ms response time.
World’s Fastest Gaming Monitor Hits 500 Hz Refresh Rate : Read more
World’s Fastest Gaming Monitor Hits 500 Hz Refresh Rate : Read more
anything beyond 240 is stupid imo. It costs so much and it barely feels different. Once you have hit like 144 or 165 I would rather up the resolution and settings.
And Plasma televisions really were 600hz...
Well for some people who play fps games competitively 240 is good to have but for average consumers, 165 is all you need.Id like to know what practical purpose this serves other than bragging rights and emptying gulible consumer pockets.
What makes 240 the magic number? Id be more inclined to agree with your 165 assessment. Not many games reach above that or if they do there isnt much visible benefit. I have a 300hz panel but have no idea why. 3070 cant reach 300 except Doom or Duke Nukem.
Not the same. Read the top post, it explains it well. Thread
Well for some people who play fps games competitively 240 is good to have but for average consumers, 165 is all you need.
I was going to say "this is getting stupid," but it got stupid a long time ago.
I'm still waiting for the science that proves that humans can really distinguish much beyond 100Hz.
That statement seems to outrage people. Outrage, but never really garner any real proof other than some "well, these couple of gamers tried it out" video, or, typically, comparing how they can see the difference and game better between 60Hz and whatever super number they're going with.
You'll wait a long time for that, the human vision system is simply not fast enough.I'm still waiting for the science that proves that humans can really distinguish much beyond 100Hz.
I can.If you can't tell the difference between 60hz and 120hz you might want to see a neurologist.
Something for you https://www.nature.com/articles/srep07861You'll wait a long time for that, the human vision system is simply not fast enough.
Honestly. This 500Hz FHD (lol) display is purely a marketing gimmick intended to bolster the brand's name rather than provide a useful option in the market among side current existing tech. BEsides, if someone did own a graphics capable of pushing out close to 500 Frames Per Second at 1080p resolutions, they are 10/10 times better off waiting until the Samsung G8 32" 4K 240hz monitor releasing in the middle of this year which result in a far greater gaming experience.anything beyond 240 is stupid imo. It costs so much and it barely feels different. Once you have hit like 144 or 165 I would rather up the resolution and settings.
Lol, anecdotal evidence has universally shown by practically everyone that has experienced it, that there is a significant difference between 60Hz and 144hz, and while less noticeable, also a difference between 144Hz and 240Hz. While it may not meet your standard of evidence, given the mountain of anecdotal testimony that exists online regarding the differences, it is rather silly to write what the two of you just wrote.You'll wait a long time for that, the human vision system is simply not fast enough.
No. I don't really understand what you are saying but it basically shows 500 pictures in each second. Response time is something to do with the color changing. This logic you have is kind of funny. Did you rip a few lines of substances before writing this?By common sense pixel response time is 1ms x 500hz = 500ms from every 1000ms(1sec) its only changing pixels. So this device half time displaying what it should and another halftime its only changing pixels. 1000hz with response time 1ms means it will never display anything properly only blurring. What do you think ? Am i right ?
The esports people will gobble this monitor up. Playing potato games at low graphics settings to eek every last possible fps only makes them a better player.Honestly. This 500Hz FHD (lol) display is purely a marketing gimmick intended to bolster the brand's name rather than provide a useful option in the market among side current existing tech. BEsides, if someone did own a graphics capable of pushing out close to 500 Frames Per Second at 1080p resolutions, they are 10/10 times better off waiting until the Samsung G8 32" 4K 240hz monitor releasing in the middle of this year which result in a far greater gaming experience.
Yes and for each 500 pictures per second all pixels have to change and switch to required color to create and prepare image to display. This display have response time 1ms to it takes 1ms to pixel to switch to create picture. And when you need 500 pictures per second it takes pixels 500ms to switch every second(1000ms) and during this time it shows only "blurring" picture because pixels are still changing to prepare picture. So half time this display not showing what it should.No. I don't really understand what you are saying but it basically shows 500 pictures in each second. Response time is something to do with the color changing. This logic you have is kind of funny. Did you rip a few lines of substances before writing this?