There is a desire in myself to commit to the very best of what the human endeavour is: application of knowledge to advance our race. You know this as engineering.
However, it has come to my attention that there is a lack of spirit, not of motivation, but of innovation. Of intelect, knowledge, and prime. The fabric of every engineer.
The very details that I should tell you would be inumerable. I will, however, tell you of shortfalls.
This post should be for general questioning and discussion, not a personal thesis titled, "My Pttiful Life."
Here are some things, food for thought, that could be up for discussion:
1. If enginers are needed, then why are all modern technology fully developed in university labs? ex: Graphene transistors, fusion reactors, mass energy storage capacitors ( the so-called 'supercaps'), mag-lev technology, ect. There is no room for any more eingineers to develop new tech, especailly a lack of a need for an uninnovative person such as myself. Every time I have an idea, someone else has alreads thought it up. What is the point in pursuing innovation, if it has bee developed?
2. The achademic community places little emphasis on advaning intellectual endeavours. The S.T.E.M programs are neglected and research is given mostly to politically charged programs. Also, such waste given to athletics and administrative bonuses/raises are illogical and juvenile for such a developed nation. We as a scociety value sports and marketing/business strategist of collegiate envoirnments more than the free thinkers who attend any pay for such endeavour.
3. There is more value placed on men like Zuckerberg, who provide us with an intangble tool that has a negative economic impact on our society. We value the billions man makes rather than the technology it is run on. I assume you may disagree with me, but wealth does not equate success. To me, wealth equated well managed finances. You may also argue Zuckerberg had bee innovative just a Jobs. However, both men stole ideas form others and captialized them. They were business men more than engineers.
In conclusion, I personally see little value in an engineeering career as I: 1. Have no thoughts on any new engineering exploration/ideas/plans/innovations, 2. The current political/social/economic climate in the US and around the world is sour, and finally 3. There is no value for anyone to pursue any career in which benefits man becasue man will surely disregard its grand merits.
End.
P.S: Here is a complimetnary song, courtesy of dogman_1234
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrBz158RzDM
However, it has come to my attention that there is a lack of spirit, not of motivation, but of innovation. Of intelect, knowledge, and prime. The fabric of every engineer.
The very details that I should tell you would be inumerable. I will, however, tell you of shortfalls.
This post should be for general questioning and discussion, not a personal thesis titled, "My Pttiful Life."
Here are some things, food for thought, that could be up for discussion:
1. If enginers are needed, then why are all modern technology fully developed in university labs? ex: Graphene transistors, fusion reactors, mass energy storage capacitors ( the so-called 'supercaps'), mag-lev technology, ect. There is no room for any more eingineers to develop new tech, especailly a lack of a need for an uninnovative person such as myself. Every time I have an idea, someone else has alreads thought it up. What is the point in pursuing innovation, if it has bee developed?
2. The achademic community places little emphasis on advaning intellectual endeavours. The S.T.E.M programs are neglected and research is given mostly to politically charged programs. Also, such waste given to athletics and administrative bonuses/raises are illogical and juvenile for such a developed nation. We as a scociety value sports and marketing/business strategist of collegiate envoirnments more than the free thinkers who attend any pay for such endeavour.
3. There is more value placed on men like Zuckerberg, who provide us with an intangble tool that has a negative economic impact on our society. We value the billions man makes rather than the technology it is run on. I assume you may disagree with me, but wealth does not equate success. To me, wealth equated well managed finances. You may also argue Zuckerberg had bee innovative just a Jobs. However, both men stole ideas form others and captialized them. They were business men more than engineers.
In conclusion, I personally see little value in an engineeering career as I: 1. Have no thoughts on any new engineering exploration/ideas/plans/innovations, 2. The current political/social/economic climate in the US and around the world is sour, and finally 3. There is no value for anyone to pursue any career in which benefits man becasue man will surely disregard its grand merits.
End.
P.S: Here is a complimetnary song, courtesy of dogman_1234
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrBz158RzDM