Wow 8350 isnt so bad

[EchoOne]

thought this video was interesting

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eu8Sekdb-IE

enjoy

 

[scottfree1]

Blasphemy! that's I7 whips 4 u amd fanboy!

 

[The Indomitable]

I wholeheartedly agree. My 8350 is so glorious.

 

[stantheman123]

LOLwut? the amd 8350 beating i5/i7s in gaming haha. nice find btw

maybie i should of got a 8320 instead of my 6300 :/

 

[linkgx1]

Wait....this is just based on integrated graphics performance. Of course. AMD ROCKS at INTEGRATED GRAPHICS. But I would like to say I want to see this with a dedicated gpu.

 

[stantheman123]

Wait....this is just based on integrated graphics performance. Of course. AMD ROCKS at INTEGRATED GRAPHICS. But I would like to say I want to see this with a dedicated gpu.

Didnt you watch the video? they were using a amd 7870 with all the tests...

 

[tonync_01]

Wait....this is just based on integrated graphics performance. Of course. AMD ROCKS at INTEGRATED GRAPHICS. But I would like to say I want to see this with a dedicated gpu.

What? The FX series cpus don't have integrated graphics.

 

[esrever]

What? The FX series cpus don't have integrated graphics.

I think there is a joke here about how bad intel's integrate graphics.

 

[twelve25]

So what's wrong with everyone else's benchmarks if this one is accurate?

 

[stantheman123]

So what's wrong with everyone else's benchmarks if this one is accurate?

Everyone is just intel fan boys? haha who knows.

 

[satyamdubey]

good vid but maybe a little unclear. around 2.27 he starts mentioning architectural differences and points out L2 cache specifically for 8350. honest mistake I guess in not mentioning dedicated L2's for Intel.

and in warhead 1080p he mentions 24.92 frames for 3570K while the vid shows 37.12 fps, another honest mistake probably 😉

I do believe that AMD does gets too bad a press. I'll hold on to my high hopes for "Steamy".
good share EchoOne

 

[stantheman123]

good vid but maybe a little unclear. around 2.27 he starts mentioning architectural differences and points out L2 cache specifically for 8350. honest mistake I guess in not mentioning dedicated L2's for Intel.

I do believe that AMD does gets too bad a press. I'll hold on to my high hopes for "Steamy". good share EchoOne

Oh yea thats why i choose the am3+ socket over the lga 1155 socket. i have too also have high hopes for steam roller. 😀

 

[lostgamer_03]

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/amd-fx-8350_6.html#sect0

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6396/the-vishera-review-amd-fx8350-fx8320-fx6300-and-fx4300-tested/5

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2012/11/06/amd-fx-8350-review/6

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-8350-vishera-review,3328-14.html

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-8350-vishera-review,3328-15.html

http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/cpu/46985-amd-fx-8350/?page=5

http://hothardware.com/Reviews/AMD-FX-8350-Vishera-8Core-CPU-Review/?page=8

I think we can conclude that the video isn't reliable, because every benchmark on the internet says otherwise.

 

[satyamdubey]

Oh yea thats why i choose the am3+ socket over the lga 1155 socket. i have too also have high hopes for steam roller. 😀

good for you. you might have already seen this: http://www.anandtech.com/show/6201/amd-details-its-3rd-gen-steamroller-architecture
but whats worth noting is that the decoder which cores in each module share in Bully has been duplicated in Steamy. This means the cores would have to wait for lesser durations to cycle tasks. lets hope Haswell-Steamy would be more neck to neck, more balanced than how it has been till now.

 

[xman20]

Wait....this is just based on integrated graphics performance. Of course. AMD ROCKS at INTEGRATED GRAPHICS. But I would like to say I want to see this with a dedicated gpu.

Maybe he was talking about the old AMD A4 dual cores

LOL

 

[twelve25]

I think we can conclude that the video isn't reliable, because every benchmark on the internet says otherwise.

I think if you are selective in what you test you can prove anything. There are plenty of apps where the AMD chips do beat Intel and plenty of games that are 95% GPU anyway.

 

[DarkSable]

Didnt you watch the video? they were using a amd 7870 with all the tests...

I'm personally all for AMD being competitive, but if that's true, than those tests are invalid.

There's a reason that when testing graphics cards you use a Xeon and when testing processors you use an extremely powerful card; you get bottlenecks otherwise, and that's going to cause havoc with results. Do this again with a 7970, or a pair of them, get the same results, and I'll start cheering.

 

[stickmansam]

Makes me wish I had gotten the 8320 or the 8350, would've been able to keep MB for steamroller too.

 

[twelve25]

I'm personally all for AMD being competitive, but if that's true, than those tests are invalid.

There's a reason that when testing graphics cards you use a Xeon and when testing processors you use an extremely powerful card; you get bottlenecks otherwise, and that's going to cause havoc with results. Do this again with a 7970, or a pair of them, get the same results, and I'll start cheering.

Do you run a pair of 7970s? I think more people are running cards in the 7850-7870 range. Who cares if the 3570K gets 20 more fps with a card I will never own?

Yes it isolates the processor, but it also creates results that mean nothing to the average user.

I want to see a review where it just lists the maximum quality settings at popular resolutions that one can use and still maintain 60fps. It's kind of pointless to see a benchmark showing 20fps for one CPU and 28 for another because that just means neither are acceptable. It's not a win if both lose.

 

[lostgamer_03]

I think if you are selective in what you test you can prove anything. There are plenty of apps where the AMD chips do beat Intel and plenty of games that are 95% GPU anyway.

Not true. Shogun 2 is a highly demanding CPU game, just look in the benchmarks.

The fact is that i5-3570k is better than gaming.

 

[neon neophyte]

should i believe this one guys benchmarks or EVERYWHERE ELSES?

hmmmm.

 

[stantheman123]

good for you. you might have already seen this: http://www.anandtech.com/show/6201/amd-details-its-3rd-gen-steamroller-architecture
but whats worth noting is that the decoder which cores in each module share in Bully has been duplicated in Steamy. This means the cores would have to wait for lesser durations to cycle tasks. lets hope Haswell-Steamy would be more neck to neck, more balanced than how it has been till now.

No i dont think ive seen that link before. nice find.

If steamroller could be competive with haswell that would be amazing. however id be happy if its on par with ivy bridge

 

[bemused_fred]

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/amd-fx-8350_6.html#sect0

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6396/the-vishera-review-amd-fx8350-fx8320-fx6300-and-fx4300-tested/5

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2012/11/06/amd-fx-8350-review/6

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-8350-vishera-review,3328-14.html

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-8350-vishera-review,3328-15.html

http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/cpu/46985-amd-fx-8350/?page=5

http://hothardware.com/Reviews/AMD-FX-8350-Vishera-8Core-CPU-Review/?page=8

I think we can conclude that the video isn't reliable, because every benchmark on the internet says otherwise.

+1

I think I'll take these many, MANY reputable, professional sites over that one Yahoo in that video.

 

[stantheman123]

+1

I think I'll take these many, MANY reputable, professional sites over that one Yahoo in that video.

i have to agree.

I still think the i5 3570k is the faster gaming cpu and will contiune to recommend to my friends and just in general people i know

 

[redeemer]

So Intel marketing+Fanboys+Biased Reviews=???