LordWolf

Distinguished
Jan 29, 2011
38
0
18,530
Already looking at this page:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/pcie-geforce-gtx-480-x16-x8-x4,2696-3.html

Now to be direct.

What is the difference? Is it the amount of 'bandwidth' available to each card? Unless I'm told otherwise, I'm going to presume it is and ask this:
Using multiple monitors (two, sometimes a third when using HDMI to the TV), is there a huge/noticeable difference when using two cards at x8?

I'm looking to upgrade my current system.
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/353512-31-some-advice-opinions
 

fantastik250

Distinguished
It will depend on the version PCI-E slot (1.0, 2.0, 3.0) and the mode (x4, x8, x16) not size.

You won't see any performance loss on a PCI-E 3.0 Slot at x8, or a PCI-E 2.0 at x16. Any lower you will start have performance loss with the top end cards.

This benchmark should help.
perfrel.gif


But for mid-range cards you will see less performance loss. And for low-range, practically no performance loss.

Hope that helps :)
 

LordWolf

Distinguished
Jan 29, 2011
38
0
18,530

Looking at a 440 and a 210/220 (I think it's a 220 but may be a 210) on a PCI-E 2.0 or 2.1 system.

Am I correct though that it's basically the amount of 'bandwidth' available to each card at a given moment?
 

DM186

Splendid
^+1
He said it all and it doesn't matter how many monitors there are. The x 16 x 8 x 4 is the speed in which info is pushed through the PCIe slot and the 1.0, 2.0, 2.1, and 3.0 is the multiplyer that you use on how much band width you are moving.

Lets say x 16 is 4000 to 8000 MB per second and I put it in to a 2.0 slot now the 8000 MB per second now becomes 16000 MB per second. Anyway thought I would share this and Good luck to you.
 

LordWolf

Distinguished
Jan 29, 2011
38
0
18,530

Thanks. So I take it that it wouldn't make a noticeable difference for me, that's what I was looking for.