Saw <A HREF="http://www.eetimes.com/semi/news/OEG20040206S0029" target="_new">this link</A> on Aces. Here is a quote:
Sounds like the INQ was right: MS refused to support 2 competing x86 extentions, and therefore forced Intel to redesign its Yamhill. If this is true, its obvious we won't see 64 bit (x86) chips from intel for quite a while.
= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =
Intel's Prescott can also support 64-bit extensions, but it is unlikely the company will offer that chip in a 64-bit version, Brookwood. The Prescott, with 64-bit extensions, is not compatible with AMD's 64-bit devices, he said.
Sounds like the INQ was right: MS refused to support 2 competing x86 extentions, and therefore forced Intel to redesign its Yamhill. If this is true, its obvious we won't see 64 bit (x86) chips from intel for quite a while.
= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =