You see the pros even call it just like JoJo!

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

"MS#1Fanboy-JoJo" <jojo@cox.net> wrote in message
news:sGj3e.63279$le4.60753@fed1read04...
>
> Word of advice to Freddy. Stop reading after the first few paragraphs and
you
> will go away happy because the last five or so paragraphs are gonna kill
you.
>
>
> http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/03/31/news_6121383.html

I wish they would give us some actual sales figures, though. The only
"figure" in that article was the indication that 50 of 150 major retailers
have sold out--only 33%. Which still doesn't tell us anything.

Case in point: My local Target received 70 units on launch day. I was there
just an hour ago, and they still have 18 units of their original shipment
left. Someone who sees that the systems are in stock might think that the
launch was therefore disappointing, dismal, a failure, underwhelming, etc.
because it didn't sell out. But I know for a fact that this same Target
store sold 37-38 PS2's on launch day and something like 24-26 Nintendo DS
handhelds on launch day. Both of those did sell out, but that's because
Target didn't have enough in stock. Yet they've actually sold more
PSP's--52--than either of those other systems sold in the first week.

Does that mean the launch was as profitable as Sony had hoped? Probably not.
Does that mean the demand was less than they expected? Maybe. Does that
mean they were finally able to supply more systems than necessary (at the
expense of Europe)? Again, maybe. We don't really know, do we?

It all depends upon whether you are a "glass is half empty" or "glass is
half full" person, I guess. I'm not looking at how many are still on the
shelves. I'm looking at how many of my friends, family, and acquaintances
purchased one, and what the general impression seems to be.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

"MS#1Fanboy-JoJo" <jojo@cox.net> wrote in message
news:sGj3e.63279$le4.60753@fed1read04...

They called it to be sold out everywhere? Huh, where?

> Word of advice to Freddy. Stop reading after the first few paragraphs and
> you
> will go away happy because the last five or so paragraphs are gonna kill
> you.

> http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/03/31/news_6121383.html

"Sony's come out and said their target customer for PSP is 18- to
34-year-olds. And that's really what they did with the original PlayStation.
That's what grew console business from being a $2 to $3 billion a year
business in the US to what it is today. I think we have the same opportunity
here with portable."

He's speculating that "18 to 34" year olds are going to buy hand helds
because they bought consoles. Quite a leap of logic. We'll see. So far,
it's been as I predicted, limited interest.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

"MS#1Fanboy-JoJo" <jojo@cox.net> wrote in message
news:sGj3e.63279$le4.60753@fed1read04...
>
> Word of advice to Freddy. Stop reading after the first few paragraphs and
> you
> will go away happy because the last five or so paragraphs are gonna kill
> you.
>
>
> http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/03/31/news_6121383.html
>
>
>
>

Damn.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

"Fred Liken" <fredliken@toocool4school.com> wrote in message
news:424de580$0$22444$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com...
> "MS#1Fanboy-JoJo" <jojo@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:sGj3e.63279$le4.60753@fed1read04...
>
> They called it to be sold out everywhere? Huh, where?
>
>> Word of advice to Freddy. Stop reading after the first few paragraphs and
>> you
>> will go away happy because the last five or so paragraphs are gonna kill
>> you.
>
>> http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/03/31/news_6121383.html
>
> "Sony's come out and said their target customer for PSP is 18- to
> 34-year-olds. And that's really what they did with the original
> PlayStation. That's what grew console business from being a $2 to $3
> billion a year business in the US to what it is today. I think we have the
> same opportunity here with portable."
>
> He's speculating that "18 to 34" year olds are going to buy hand helds
> because they bought consoles. Quite a leap of logic. We'll see. So far,
> it's been as I predicted, limited interest.
>

What have you seen to support your use of the word "limited"? What
evidence do you have without numbers? Would 300,000 in a week indicate
"limited" interest in your eyes?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

In article <xbednQFtIp9JSNDfRVn-sw@comcast.com>, androvich@NOcomcastSPAM.net
says...
>
>
>"MS#1Fanboy-JoJo" <jojo@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:sGj3e.63279$le4.60753@fed1read04...
>>
>> Word of advice to Freddy. Stop reading after the first few paragraphs and
>you
>> will go away happy because the last five or so paragraphs are gonna kill
>you.
>>
>>
>> http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/03/31/news_6121383.html
>
>I wish they would give us some actual sales figures, though. The only
>"figure" in that article was the indication that 50 of 150 major retailers
>have sold out--only 33%. Which still doesn't tell us anything.
>
>Case in point: My local Target received 70 units on launch day. I was there
>just an hour ago, and they still have 18 units of their original shipment
>left. Someone who sees that the systems are in stock might think that the
>launch was therefore disappointing, dismal, a failure, underwhelming, etc.
>because it didn't sell out. But I know for a fact that this same Target
>store sold 37-38 PS2's on launch day and something like 24-26 Nintendo DS
>handhelds on launch day. Both of those did sell out, but that's because
>Target didn't have enough in stock. Yet they've actually sold more
>PSP's--52--than either of those other systems sold in the first week.
>
>Does that mean the launch was as profitable as Sony had hoped? Probably not.
>Does that mean the demand was less than they expected? Maybe. Does that
>mean they were finally able to supply more systems than necessary (at the
>expense of Europe)? Again, maybe. We don't really know, do we?
>
>It all depends upon whether you are a "glass is half empty" or "glass is
>half full" person, I guess. I'm not looking at how many are still on the
>shelves. I'm looking at how many of my friends, family, and acquaintances
>purchased one, and what the general impression seems to be.
>
>
I'm always a glass half full type person with products I like. When I don't
like a product I just leave it alone. In other words when the DS came out I
didn't troll the Nintendo newsgroup talking smack about it.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

In article <424de580$0$22444$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com>,
fredliken@toocool4school.com says...
>
>"MS#1Fanboy-JoJo" <jojo@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:sGj3e.63279$le4.60753@fed1read04...
>
>They called it to be sold out everywhere? Huh, where?
>
>> Word of advice to Freddy. Stop reading after the first few paragraphs and
>> you
>> will go away happy because the last five or so paragraphs are gonna kill
>> you.
>
>> http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/03/31/news_6121383.html
>
>"Sony's come out and said their target customer for PSP is 18- to
>34-year-olds. And that's really what they did with the original PlayStation.
>That's what grew console business from being a $2 to $3 billion a year
>business in the US to what it is today. I think we have the same opportunity
>here with portable."
>
>He's speculating that "18 to 34" year olds are going to buy hand helds
>because they bought consoles. Quite a leap of logic. We'll see. So far,
>it's been as I predicted, limited interest.
>
>

I'm speculating that everybody and their grandmother is going to want a PSP
after seeing one in action.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

"Fred Liken" <fredliken@toocool4school.com> wrote in message
news:424de580$0$22444$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com...
> "MS#1Fanboy-JoJo" <jojo@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:sGj3e.63279$le4.60753@fed1read04...
>
> They called it to be sold out everywhere? Huh, where?
>
>> Word of advice to Freddy. Stop reading after the first few paragraphs and
>> you
>> will go away happy because the last five or so paragraphs are gonna kill
>> you.
>
>> http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/03/31/news_6121383.html
>
> "Sony's come out and said their target customer for PSP is 18- to
> 34-year-olds. And that's really what they did with the original
> PlayStation. That's what grew console business from being a $2 to $3
> billion a year business in the US to what it is today. I think we have the
> same opportunity here with portable."
>
> He's speculating that "18 to 34" year olds are going to buy hand helds
> because they bought consoles. Quite a leap of logic. We'll see. So far,
> it's been as I predicted, limited interest.
>

I have to agree with this point, it's just not the same market. It's a
handheld gadget... people buy them because they "look cool", it's more of an
impulse buy than anything else.

As a movie player it isn't particularly great, and it isn't much of a rival
to the iPod... I don't think those features are going to significantly
elevate it above past handhelds to the level of consoles. To me, the
prospect of playing on a PSP doesn't *feel* the same as playing on a
console.

I'm not going to buy a PSP because experience tells me I'm going to become
bored with it, that's the way it was with the gameboy series (although I
would buy the next generation gameboy...) and it's the way it's going to be
with the PSP.

It's all especially true when you look at the games being released for the
PSP; they're games you could find on the PS2. You're not going to sit at
home, and play on a tiny PSP when you could be playing the same kind of
games on a PS2 in front of a massive television. No one in their right minds
would buy a huge library of games for their PSP (cost considerations) if
they're just going to play them on the move.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

"Richard Strong" <richard.strong@ntl'remove'world.com> wrote in message
news:qaW3e.2877$il.1829@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...
>
> "Fred Liken" <fredliken@toocool4school.com> wrote in message
> news:424de580$0$22444$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com...
>> "MS#1Fanboy-JoJo" <jojo@cox.net> wrote in message
>> news:sGj3e.63279$le4.60753@fed1read04...
>>
>> They called it to be sold out everywhere? Huh, where?
>>
>>> Word of advice to Freddy. Stop reading after the first few paragraphs
>>> and you
>>> will go away happy because the last five or so paragraphs are gonna kill
>>> you.
>>
>>> http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/03/31/news_6121383.html
>>
>> "Sony's come out and said their target customer for PSP is 18- to
>> 34-year-olds. And that's really what they did with the original
>> PlayStation. That's what grew console business from being a $2 to $3
>> billion a year business in the US to what it is today. I think we have
>> the same opportunity here with portable."
>>
>> He's speculating that "18 to 34" year olds are going to buy hand helds
>> because they bought consoles. Quite a leap of logic. We'll see. So
>> far, it's been as I predicted, limited interest.
>>
>
> I have to agree with this point, it's just not the same market. It's a
> handheld gadget... people buy them because they "look cool", it's more of
> an impulse buy than anything else.
>
> As a movie player it isn't particularly great, and it isn't much of a
> rival to the iPod...

That isn't what financial experts are saying. As a matter of fact, there
was a story on CNN (don't know for sure) about Ipod's price drop being
directly connected to the release of the PSP.

>I don't think those features are going to significantly elevate it above
>past handhelds to the level of consoles. To me, the prospect of playing on
>a PSP doesn't *feel* the same as playing on a console.
>

Some deal in prospects while those of us who are playing are experiencing
the reality and it has squashed the aprehension.

> I'm not going to buy a PSP because experience tells me I'm going to become
> bored with it, that's the way it was with the gameboy series (although I
> would buy the next generation gameboy...) and it's the way it's going to
> be with the PSP.
>
> It's all especially true when you look at the games being released for the
> PSP; they're games you could find on the PS2. You're not going to sit at
> home, and play on a tiny PSP when you could be playing the same kind of
> games on a PS2 in front of a massive television. No one in their right
> minds would buy a huge library of games for their PSP (cost
> considerations) if they're just going to play them on the move.
>

I guess there are a lot of people not in their right mind. There are
100,000's of people who are at home playing their PSP's as we speak. It is
something I can do while watching TV which is something I couldn't do with
my PS2 unless I put it on split screen and then you lose quality sound with
either TV or the game. I understand everything you are saying and it is
quite logical. Unfortunately, logic goes right out the door as soon as you
start playing with one of these bad boys. You can believe all the hype you
want about it not being a good MP3 player or video player but anyone who has
used it extensively as either (I have only done video to any great degree)
will be able to tell you much different. I used the software and converted
an episode of The Office and it is so sweet.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

"Mattinglyfan" <Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> wrote in message
news:nbWdnQ4PnIsjxs3fRVn-ig@comcast.com...
>
> "Richard Strong" <richard.strong@ntl'remove'world.com> wrote in message
> news:qaW3e.2877$il.1829@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...
> >
> > "Fred Liken" <fredliken@toocool4school.com> wrote in message
> > news:424de580$0$22444$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com...
> >> "MS#1Fanboy-JoJo" <jojo@cox.net> wrote in message
> >> news:sGj3e.63279$le4.60753@fed1read04...
> >>
> >> They called it to be sold out everywhere? Huh, where?
> >>
> >>> Word of advice to Freddy. Stop reading after the first few paragraphs
> >>> and you
> >>> will go away happy because the last five or so paragraphs are gonna
kill
> >>> you.
> >>
> >>> http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/03/31/news_6121383.html
> >>
> >> "Sony's come out and said their target customer for PSP is 18- to
> >> 34-year-olds. And that's really what they did with the original
> >> PlayStation. That's what grew console business from being a $2 to $3
> >> billion a year business in the US to what it is today. I think we have
> >> the same opportunity here with portable."
> >>
> >> He's speculating that "18 to 34" year olds are going to buy hand helds
> >> because they bought consoles. Quite a leap of logic. We'll see. So
> >> far, it's been as I predicted, limited interest.
> >>
> >
> > I have to agree with this point, it's just not the same market. It's a
> > handheld gadget... people buy them because they "look cool", it's more
of
> > an impulse buy than anything else.
> >
> > As a movie player it isn't particularly great, and it isn't much of a
> > rival to the iPod...
>
> That isn't what financial experts are saying. As a matter of fact, there
> was a story on CNN (don't know for sure) about Ipod's price drop being
> directly connected to the release of the PSP.
>
> >I don't think those features are going to significantly elevate it above
> >past handhelds to the level of consoles. To me, the prospect of playing
on
> >a PSP doesn't *feel* the same as playing on a console.
> >
>
> Some deal in prospects while those of us who are playing are experiencing
> the reality and it has squashed the aprehension.
>
> > I'm not going to buy a PSP because experience tells me I'm going to
become
> > bored with it, that's the way it was with the gameboy series (although I
> > would buy the next generation gameboy...) and it's the way it's going to
> > be with the PSP.
> >
> > It's all especially true when you look at the games being released for
the
> > PSP; they're games you could find on the PS2. You're not going to sit at
> > home, and play on a tiny PSP when you could be playing the same kind of
> > games on a PS2 in front of a massive television. No one in their right
> > minds would buy a huge library of games for their PSP (cost
> > considerations) if they're just going to play them on the move.
> >
>
> I guess there are a lot of people not in their right mind. There are
> 100,000's of people who are at home playing their PSP's as we speak. It
is
> something I can do while watching TV which is something I couldn't do with
> my PS2 unless I put it on split screen and then you lose quality sound
with
> either TV or the game. I understand everything you are saying and it is
> quite logical. Unfortunately, logic goes right out the door as soon as
you
> start playing with one of these bad boys. You can believe all the hype
you
> want about it not being a good MP3 player or video player but anyone who
has
> used it extensively as either (I have only done video to any great degree)
> will be able to tell you much different. I used the software and
converted
> an episode of The Office and it is so sweet.

I agree. I fully expected to be interested in the PSP almost solely as a
game machine, yet for the first three days after purchasing one, I spent
more time watching Spider-Man 2, listening to MP3's, and organizing pictures
into slide shows. It's like I almost entirely forgot about it from a game
playing perspective! And all the non-gamers I've shown it to have expressed
an interest in the device because a) it's a cool new electronic gadget, and
b) it plays movies and music and shows pictures, and c) it also plays games,
which they aren't interested in for themselves but for their kids.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

Mattinglyfan wrote in alt.games.video.sony-playstation2:

> Richard Strong wrote...
>
>> As a movie player it isn't particularly great, and it isn't much of a
>> rival to the iPod...
>
> That isn't what financial experts are saying. As a matter of fact,
> there was a story on CNN (don't know for sure) about Ipod's price drop
> being directly connected to the release of the PSP.

Links, please? :)

(MANDATORY DISCLAIMER: I am the proud owner of a 20GB 4G iPod, so my
views may be *slightly* biased.)

The idea of the iPod price drops being related to the PSP's release is
rather unlikely, IMHO. If the iPod price drops were related to the PSP's
release, Apple would have done an across-the-board drop, and much
earlier than just two months ago. However, the price cuts affected only
*two models* -- the 4GB mini and the 60GB photo. The prices of the two
20GB models and the shuffles remained unchanged, and the two new models
(the 6GB mini and the 30GB photo) were introduced at price points
commensurate with their capacities and capabilities.

As for comparing the iPod to the PSP as a music player, there is IMHO no
comparison -- the iPod is smaller, easier to use, has a longer battery
life, and doesn't rely on proprietary media for music storage. It's also
more cost-effective than the PSP as a music player -- true, a 512MB
Memory Stick PRO Duo costs less than a 512MB shuffle, but one needs a
$250 PSP to play any songs stored on that Memory Stick. Heck, a 1GB Sony
High-Speed Memory Stick PRO Duo *alone* costs almost as much as a 4GB
mini!

This is not to say that the concept behind the PSP is a bad one -- true,
one can do much more with the PSP, like play games and movies, than just
playing music. But to compare the PSP (which is more like a jack-of-all-
trades, master-of-none type of device in my view) to the iPod (which
does only one thing, but does it exceptionally well IMO) is comparing
oranges to apples (pun intended).

--
Glenn Shaw • Indianapolis, IN USA
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

"Richard Strong" <richard.strong@ntl'remove'world.com> wrote in message
news:qaW3e.2877$il.1829@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...

> I have to agree with this point, it's just not the same market. It's a
> handheld gadget... people buy them because they "look cool", it's more of
> an impulse buy than anything else.

True. That's why I haven't replaced mine.

> As a movie player it isn't particularly great, and it isn't much of a
> rival to the iPod... I don't think those features are going to
> significantly elevate it above past handhelds to the level of consoles. To
> me, the prospect of playing on a PSP doesn't *feel* the same as playing on
> a console.

It'll never rival the iPod, etc, using Duo's compared to HDDs. And the
movies are seriously hamstringed by the Duo as well. It's media playing
capabilities are a moot point, really. You can get a GBA to play movies and
music, but use actually significant media sizes, if you wish. Seems kind of
dumb, IMO, to pay the prices for a one or two gig MS when you could get a
capable media player for around 400 bucks that plays movies, music, etc, and
has real storage space to accommodate it.

> It's all especially true when you look at the games being released for the
> PSP; they're games you could find on the PS2. You're not going to sit at
> home, and play on a tiny PSP when you could be playing the same kind of
> games on a PS2 in front of a massive television. No one in their right
> minds would buy a huge library of games for their PSP (cost
> considerations) if they're just going to play them on the move.


I impulse bought it (was DOA) but now from the line up, I'm probably not
going to buy one for quite a while. I can afford to wait seeing as the only
game on it now that isn't a console rehash that is interesting is lum. They
need to make some games that are suited for portable gaming. It seems that
all Sony's doing is porting console games. What's the point? They need
games that fit a portable scenario.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

Fred Liken wrote:
> "Richard Strong" <richard.strong@ntl'remove'world.com> wrote in message
> news:qaW3e.2877$il.1829@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...
>
>
>>I have to agree with this point, it's just not the same market. It's a
>>handheld gadget... people buy them because they "look cool", it's more of
>>an impulse buy than anything else.
>
>
> True. That's why I haven't replaced mine.
>
>
>>As a movie player it isn't particularly great, and it isn't much of a
>>rival to the iPod... I don't think those features are going to
>>significantly elevate it above past handhelds to the level of consoles. To
>>me, the prospect of playing on a PSP doesn't *feel* the same as playing on
>>a console.
>
>
> It'll never rival the iPod, etc, using Duo's compared to HDDs. And the
> movies are seriously hamstringed by the Duo as well. It's media playing
> capabilities are a moot point, really. You can get a GBA to play movies and
> music, but use actually significant media sizes, if you wish. Seems kind of
> dumb, IMO, to pay the prices for a one or two gig MS when you could get a
> capable media player for around 400 bucks that plays movies, music, etc, and
> has real storage space to accommodate it.

For $250 though you get an AWESOME gaming machine, that also can do
movies, music, pictures, etc.. You are full of it!!


>
>>It's all especially true when you look at the games being released for the
>>PSP; they're games you could find on the PS2. You're not going to sit at
>>home, and play on a tiny PSP when you could be playing the same kind of
>>games on a PS2 in front of a massive television. No one in their right
>>minds would buy a huge library of games for their PSP (cost
>>considerations) if they're just going to play them on the move.
>
>
>
> I impulse bought it (was DOA) but now from the line up, I'm probably not
> going to buy one for quite a while. I can afford to wait seeing as the only
> game on it now that isn't a console rehash that is interesting is lum. They
> need to make some games that are suited for portable gaming. It seems that
> all Sony's doing is porting console games. What's the point? They need
> games that fit a portable scenario.
>

The games fit portable gaming just fine...try again.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

>> I'm in the demographic that Sony wants to sell the PSP too, but I don't
>> own a PS2... i'm not interested in the games. I've already said I'm not
>> particularly interested in the limited music and movie capabilities (let's
>> face it, it's not out of the box seamless - that doesn't bother me at
>> all... but it's a sticking point for some). How are they going to sell
>> this to me? They're not.
>
>
>Than why in the hell are you here (a sony playstation 2 newsgroup) if you
>don't own a PS2 and have zero interest in the PSP?

I have to agree - You've just admitted you're a troll given the fact
you don't own a PSP, nor a PS2, but just want to argue for the sake of
it.

Then again - It's what I expect from the Internet these days...

N*
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

"massivegrooves" <massivegrooves@massivegrooves.net> wrote in message
news:4251A8B7.3020701@massivegrooves.net...

>> It'll never rival the iPod, etc, using Duo's compared to HDDs. And the
>> movies are seriously hamstringed by the Duo as well. It's media playing
>> capabilities are a moot point, really. You can get a GBA to play movies
>> and music, but use actually significant media sizes, if you wish. Seems
>> kind of dumb, IMO, to pay the prices for a one or two gig MS when you
>> could get a capable media player for around 400 bucks that plays movies,
>> music, etc, and has real storage space to accommodate it.
>
> For $250 though you get an AWESOME gaming machine, that also can do
> movies, music, pictures, etc.. You are full of it!!

What part of it not rivalling iPods and the ilk didn't you understand? You
are being foolish using your circular reasonning. It's commical.

> The games fit portable gaming just fine...try again.

Sadly, no, they don't. Name one, besides lum?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

Fred Liken wrote:
> "massivegrooves" <massivegrooves@massivegrooves.net> wrote in message
> news:4251A8B7.3020701@massivegrooves.net...
>
>
>>>It'll never rival the iPod, etc, using Duo's compared to HDDs. And the
>>>movies are seriously hamstringed by the Duo as well. It's media playing
>>>capabilities are a moot point, really. You can get a GBA to play movies
>>>and music, but use actually significant media sizes, if you wish. Seems
>>>kind of dumb, IMO, to pay the prices for a one or two gig MS when you
>>>could get a capable media player for around 400 bucks that plays movies,
>>>music, etc, and has real storage space to accommodate it.
>>
>>For $250 though you get an AWESOME gaming machine, that also can do
>>movies, music, pictures, etc.. You are full of it!!
>
>
> What part of it not rivalling iPods and the ilk didn't you understand? You
> are being foolish using your circular reasonning. It's commical.

You sure like the word "ilk." Can you go one post without using it ;)


>
>>The games fit portable gaming just fine...try again.
>
>
> Sadly, no, they don't. Name one, besides lum?
>

Any of them do, Tiger Woods does, Ridge Race does, etc.. Just because
you have a problem with them or the PSP, or Sony or whatever doesn't
mean they are not suitable for portable gaming. Being able to play a
round of golf, or even 9 holes, or run a race or two, or whatever is
really no different than anything else out there and makes for great
portable gaming. Quick and easy, not over involved, etc.. I guess in
your world every portable game has to be a puzzle game or something of
that "ilk." ;)
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

Android wrote:

>
>Aside from the Xbox having a hard
>drive, no other console includes a memory card with purchase.
>
>

The Japanese launch PS2s did (because of the need for one to use the DVD
drivers).


Henry LaPierre
freeza@ix.netcom.com
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

"massivegrooves" <massivegrooves@massivegrooves.net> wrote in message
news:4251D30A.5010106@massivegrooves.net...

>>>The games fit portable gaming just fine...try again.
>>
>> Sadly, no, they don't. Name one, besides lum?
>
> Any of them do, Tiger Woods does,

lol. Yes, spastic load times are portable material.

> Ridge Race does, etc..

Quarter Minute load times... on a portable?

> Just because you have a problem with them or the PSP, or Sony or whatever
> doesn't mean they are not suitable for portable gaming.

That's ad hominem. Uncalled for.

> Being able to play a round of golf, or even 9 holes, or run a race or two,
> or whatever is really no different than anything else out there and makes
> for great portable gaming.

That's not the point. There's been great racing and golf games on portables
before.

> Quick

Ding ding ding....

> and easy, not over involved, etc.. I guess in your world every portable
> game has to be a puzzle game

You totally missed the point, my friend.

> or something of that "ilk." ;)

What's your hang up? Does vocabulary intimidate you, or something? That's
lamerz.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

"Android" <androvich@NOcomcastSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:WPOdnfz7oKvPqc_fRVn-hg@comcast.com...

> Just when I got used to disagreeing with him (regarding the PSP), you had
> to
> bring up his past political commentary...which I most often agree with.

Hey, every dog has his day, no? :)
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

Fred Liken wrote:
> "massivegrooves" <massivegrooves@massivegrooves.net> wrote in message
> news:4251D30A.5010106@massivegrooves.net...
>
>
>>>>The games fit portable gaming just fine...try again.
>>>
>>>Sadly, no, they don't. Name one, besides lum?
>>
>>Any of them do, Tiger Woods does,
>
>
> lol. Yes, spastic load times are portable material.
>
>
>>Ridge Race does, etc..
>
>
> Quarter Minute load times... on a portable?
>
>
>>Just because you have a problem with them or the PSP, or Sony or whatever
>>doesn't mean they are not suitable for portable gaming.
>
>
> That's ad hominem. Uncalled for.


Lol...Mr. insult didn't like that. That is hilarious ;)


>
>>Being able to play a round of golf, or even 9 holes, or run a race or two,
>>or whatever is really no different than anything else out there and makes
>>for great portable gaming.
>
>
> That's not the point. There's been great racing and golf games on portables
> before.


So them being on another system now is suddenly unsuitable? Get real,
you are a hater plain and simple. Sony doing it is somehow not okay?
That they did something that has been done before is that the problem?
Seems to me most of the Nintendo stuff is games that have been done
before, re-hashes, etc.. You just hate Sony plain and simple, admit it
and move on.


>
>>Quick
>
>
> Ding ding ding....
>
>
>>and easy, not over involved, etc.. I guess in your world every portable
>>game has to be a puzzle game
>
>
> You totally missed the point, my friend.


I am not your friend, nor would I want to be...


>
>>or something of that "ilk." ;)
>
>
> What's your hang up? Does vocabulary intimidate you, or something? That's
> lamerz.
>

Nope sure doesn't...you have these keywords though that you seem to like
to toss around, and that is one that you have used to death.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

"massivegrooves" <massivegrooves@massivegrooves.net> wrote in message
news:4252C2CE.3020800@massivegrooves.net...

>>>Any of them do, Tiger Woods does,

>> lol. Yes, spastic load times are portable material.

>>>Ridge Race does, etc..

>> Quarter Minute load times... on a portable?

>>>Being able to play a round of golf, or even 9 holes, or run a race or
>>>two, or whatever is really no different than anything else out there and
>>>makes for great portable gaming.

>> That's not the point. There's been great racing and golf games on
>> portables before.

> So them being on another system now is suddenly unsuitable?

Are you feigning stupidity? Honestly, what part of "quarter minute load
times" didn't you understand? Them having quarter minute load times make
them unsuitable, my ignorant friend. Are you caught up, now?

> Get real, you are a hater plain and simple.

Blah blah blah. You can keep saying it until you're blue in the face and
ignore the facts, but it won't change anything.

> Sony doing it is somehow not okay?

Sony's the first to "do it". Please catch up, son.

> That they did something that has been done before is that the problem?

No, they are doing something that has not been done before...

Sigh, you are very dense.

> Seems to me most of the Nintendo stuff is games that have been done
> before, re-hashes, etc.. You just hate Sony plain and simple, admit it and
> move on.

You're cute when you're flailing about in your diaper, there, skippy.

>>>Quick
>>
>> Ding ding ding....

Woosh.

>>>and easy, not over involved, etc.. I guess in your world every portable
>>>game has to be a puzzle game
>>
>> You totally missed the point, my friend.
>
> I am not your friend, nor would I want to be...

Whatever, friend.

>>>or something of that "ilk." ;)
>>
>> What's your hang up? Does vocabulary intimidate you, or something?
>> That's lamerz.
>
> Nope sure doesn't...

Then get over it and prove it. :)

I hope your next post is not as silly and clueless as your last. The point
was pretty direct, and it's been stated three times now. Hopefully you'll
decide that pure ad hominem attacks aren't getting you anywhere and will
decide to actually argue the point. Probably not, seeing as you're simply a
fan boy flailing about.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

>> Any of them do, Tiger Woods does,
>lol. Yes, spastic load times are portable material.
>> Ridge Race does, etc..
>Quarter Minute load times... on a portable?

FUD, FUD, FUD...

These load times you're talking about probably come from a Nintendo
forum. You probably haven't even played PSP Ridge Racer. I have it in
my hand and it loads in 9 seconds counted.

I don't know the load times of Tiger Woods because I haven't played it
yet but given your statement about RR, I can only imagine TWG doesn't
have that much of a load time.

Return to your Nintendo forum, you'll be happier there :)
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

>I've played it

You must have been playing the PS1 version LOL
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

<arfinmail@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1112818779.640560.45100@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

>>Quarter Minute load times... on a portable?

> FUD, FUD, FUD...

> These load times you're talking about probably come from a Nintendo
> forum.

I've played it, but you don't have to take my word for it. IGN and
Gamespot, for one, both say the same thing about it. So, psp.ign.com's
review is from a Nintendo forum? Gamespot.com's news is a Nintendo forum?

Oh, I forgot. Everyone that says anything that you think is bad about the
PSP is a Nintendolt.

> You probably haven't even played PSP Ridge Racer. I have it in
> my hand and it loads in 9 seconds counted.

It takes you 15 seconds to count to 9? That's sad. Very sad.

> I don't know the load times of Tiger Woods because I haven't played it
> yet but given your statement about RR, I can only imagine TWG doesn't
> have that much of a load time.

lol. Whatever.

> Return to your Nintendo forum, you'll be happier there :)

I'm fine, thanks.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (More info?)

<arfinmail@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1112836553.663385.234640@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> >I've played it
>
> You must have been playing the PS1 version LOL

Oops, you're right! I was! LOL