News YouTube uses lower quality options on browsers with 'aarch64' Arm-based systems — reporting 'x86_64' appears to be a widespread browser fix

Status
Not open for further replies.

Admin

Administrator
Staff member
Arm architectures are usually reserved for low power devices like tablets and phones, where battery life is sensitive. There are so many ARM based chips, it's hard to say if certain combo is ( chip is particularly power efficient at 4k av1. Heck,early rasp pis had poor fp performance and horrid java support. So I could understand it taking the safe route if it's not known the particular architecture (hardware and software) supports it.
 
Where are all these Arm's that are so powerful? I tried this trick on both my Lenovo Chromebook and my rpi4. Both Suck, and had to revert. More B.S. from Tom's Hardware.
 
ARM is trash for a lot of things, but video playback isn't one of them. Defaulting options is one thing, but not allowing any other choice is ridiculous. To then have the trigger for this lock being something that is easily countered is proof this move is short sighted.
 
Note that the developer on Mastodon believes this issue only occurs if you're using software decoding.

It does seem plausible that this was just some lazy heuristic implemented years ago. Which would have made some sense at the time, as most ARM chips were relatively slow and probably would have performed poorly trying to decode high res video in SW. As that changed over the years, everyone else just worked around it (by spoofing UA or whatever), and that increasingly obsolete heuristic never got updated. The fact that higher resolutions were blocked altogether, rather than simply not being the default, is suspicious though.

It seems unlikely that Asahi linux was specifically targeted. Some of the commenters on Hacker News mention then Asahi devs have a reputation for being... dramatic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.