Zerk2012,
Please read my previous post. While I agree that your suggestion to buy a better cooler is indeed very sound advice, your suggestion that OCCT is a "
no brainer" is misleading, because it's missing some critical information. It's fine if users prefer to use OCCT over Prime95, but they still need to know which settings to use, so we need to be more specific.
If OCCT is allowed to use default settings, it runs "Instruction Set" in "Auto", which means that a processor with AVX Instruction Sets, such as the 4790K, will use it's AVX and AVX2 Instruction Sets. This will typically drive a 4790K running the stock cooler in a normal ambient environment to Throttle at 100°C, which is the same as Prime95 will do when allowed to use default settings.
As per Intel’s Datasheets, TDP and Thermal Specifications are validated “without AVX”. To eliminate AVX variables, both OCCT and Prime95 require proper configuration.
For everyone's benefit,
we can not assume that users know which utilities and tests to run, and how to run them properly. It is necessary that we
explain ourselves very clearly and completely,
rather that just say "run OCCT" or "run Prime95" or "run AIDA64", which often leads users to inconsistent, conflicting and confusing test results. For example, AIDA64 has 4 CPU related stress test selections (CPU, FPU, Cache, Memory) which have
15 possible combinations that yield
15 different workloads and
15 different Core temperatures. That's a lot of variables.
These illustrations are from our
Intel CPU Temperature Guide 2021:
Utilities that don't
overload or
underload your processor will give you a valid thermal baseline. Here’s a comparison of utilities grouped as
thermal and
stability tests according to % of TDP, averaged across six processor Generations at
stock Intel settings rounded to the nearest 5%:
Although these tests range from
70% to 130% TDP workload, Windows Task Manager interprets every test as
100% CPU Utilization, which is processor resource activity,
not actual %TDP workload.
Core temperatures respond directly to Power consumption (Watts), which is driven by workload. As workload increases, CPU resource activity can only increase to a maximum of 100% Utilization, while CPU Power consumption can increase well above 100% TDP, especially if overclocked.
Prime95 Small FFTs
(AVX disabled) provides the correct workload for testing thermal performance. However, if OCCT's first test, called "CPU", is configured for
Small Data Set,
Normal Mode,
Steady Load and
SSE Instruction Set (no AVX), then it's a
steady-state workload at more than 97% that's
nearly identical to the
steady-state 100% workload of Prime95
Small FFTs with
all AVX test selection disabled. A
steady-state 100% TDP workload is key for testing thermal performance, so the CPU, cooler, socket, motherboard and VRMs can thermally stabilize.
Upon first run, either
OCCT or Prime95 require about the same number of mouse clicks to get them properly configured for testing thermal performance.
As a footnote, when CineBench R23 (as well as R20) are run using the Multi Core test, although they use a realistic AVX workload, Power consumption and Core temperatures are
nearly identical to both OCCT and Prime95 when configured as described above, where all three utilities are within a few watts and degrees of one another. Although the CineBench workload is relatively steady, since it pauses between renderings, which allows the processor to cool, it's not truly a
steady-state workload.
Run these three utilities and compare Power consumption and Core temperatures for yourself. If you use an additional utility with graphs which overlay monitoring information, such as Intel XTU, AIDA64 or SpeedFan, then you can get a more complete overview and perspective of Power and thermal behaviors, rather than just observing numerical values.
CT