Recent content by c1c2c3c4c

@CyberAngel quantum computers can handle some image data in theory and since 1qbit per second = 1^2bit per second (500bit/s = 250000qbit/s) the resulting speed would be much faster. so there is definatly smaller and faster GPU beyond nano tubes... they just don't resemble todays computers...

let me clarify, that last statement nano tubes can be superconductors or semiconductors depending on there arrangement and the heat could be generated in the semiconductor state.

carbon nano tubes should be used to build gpus, lol they have superconductivity due to quantum tunneling which would mean that there power is only limited by the amount of energy you can supply, and they would have 0% heat generation.... nVidia please get away from silicon its already to small...

[nom]new003[/nomMaxwell will be crazy. I mean applications probably won't take advantage of it for a long time right? a good ray tracing program could fill most of the extra processing power, and the rest could be used to add tessellation, true 3d rendering and depth of field... theres a long...

current benches do put the gf100 on top of the gpu linup beating the 5970 and the price was commented as, plesently supprising