Recent content by wehler53

I am manually setting the clock, 3900x's from what ive read are having issues with hitting their 4.6 single core and only hitting 4.2, that was what i saw, even letting it have access to over 1.45v when it wanted. Im running sustained loads using Prime95 and Heavy load, and running 10 cinebench...

Yeah i figured that out along the way, and i understand thats how it works, just the variance was much higher than ive seen in multiple other custom water cooled builds and was quite different from what i was seeing on the same system only a couple days earlier. And higher than what i saw on...

Full system specs are already listed. Ive moved it to a 1.225v 4.2 all core OC and I'm out performing full stock R20, time spy, and fire strike performance, temps are even better now as well. And i know they have said it can go that high, but it was running 1.4v at lowest points before the...

Id reccomend doing manually rather than with the AI systems Asus has, most CPUs have plenty of guides on manually overclocking that'll tell you where to start and ehat increments to move up in. Having palyed around with all of the Asus smart oc features I quickly went back to manual

64GB actually, i think i could maybe hit 3200 with some messing aorund with the SOC voltage, but currently im seeing what i can do with low voltage OC's

Just moved on to 1.2v 4.2 all core, looking good in the first 10 minutes, 49/50 degrees 100% load, looking stable will definietly have to check out some higher frequency OC's if this remains stable

Custom loop

3.8 is standard clock, with up to 4.6 on two cores (with boost), im focusing on low temp all core 100% oc atm, im at 55 degrees after 2 hours 100% load, i want to avoid going over 1.25v because of depreciating life of the cpu when used daily above that voltage. 4.3 might be possible at 1.25, 4.2...

Hi all, Im playing around with low voltage OC on my ryzen 3900x after seeing this https://www.pcgamesn.com/amd/ryzen-9-3900x-overclock (basically only 6% can sustain 4.2 all core at 1.25v as per silicon lottery). Im currently stable at 4.2 1.225V, im curious particularly to anyone else for...

Well i have what so far appears to be a stable 4.2 to all cores at 1.25v, seems promising based on what ive read online. Temps are much more stable now, low 40s across the board on around 10% load (makes me fairly sure the ofset to 1.2 was working), i think the AMD Boost settings could have been...

True, but interestingly Ryzen master is reading 1.42v to all cores... Hmmm im going to go and have a play with it and see what happens, test some OC's and some under voltages and see where i land

Perphaps, im not awfully concerned averaged out its sitting at around 38-40 idle and then around 45 under load. And i could of course see better performance and temps by spending sometime in the bios playing it all to find the sweet spot. Im probably just overthinking the read out from AIDA64...

However CPUID HWmonitor is reading out voltages at 1.42, despite bios, AI suite 5, CPUID ROG and Aida64 all reading out 1.2, not idea whats going on with that

Originally it was at 1.45 and i was actually at 45 degrees pretty well flat line for temp, as oyu can imagine at that volatge the load temps didnt shift more than 5 degrees. I noticed the voltage whilst mapping it with AIDA64 and went straight to a -0.2 offset, AIDA64 is telling me i have stable...

I understand that, but your original message contained no such metion to anything other than about what idle was in your opinion, im not trying to have a go at you or anything. I get what your saying, but im mapping CPU usage and Voltage over time against temperature and its not lining up...