I know there are a lot of topics on this but most for for 1080p and 4K.
Many when upgrading resolution want the highest settings and I feel like thats what benchmarks are about.
So recently I upgraded my monitor size and now its wider than my previous one, but I went from standard HD somewhere between 720p and 1080p to 1440p.
I was all excited for this until I tried running KSP, FSX, CSGO, Orbiter etc.
On counter strike, you can lower the resolution and full screen will always work, but for Kerbal Space Program, if you use fullscreen on a lower resolution it will not be so full screen.
On 1440p lowest details it stays at 14fps with my current old GPU.
I don't want to run at high settings, I don't even need medium settings because I am not that picky about graphics, but my resolution has to be 1440p to run KSP at full screen.
For running low settings 1440p, could a 750ti do it today? Because that just happens to be what my friend has who is upgrading their machine. Or would stronger hardware be required?
Thanks!
Many when upgrading resolution want the highest settings and I feel like thats what benchmarks are about.
So recently I upgraded my monitor size and now its wider than my previous one, but I went from standard HD somewhere between 720p and 1080p to 1440p.
I was all excited for this until I tried running KSP, FSX, CSGO, Orbiter etc.
On counter strike, you can lower the resolution and full screen will always work, but for Kerbal Space Program, if you use fullscreen on a lower resolution it will not be so full screen.
On 1440p lowest details it stays at 14fps with my current old GPU.
I don't want to run at high settings, I don't even need medium settings because I am not that picky about graphics, but my resolution has to be 1440p to run KSP at full screen.
For running low settings 1440p, could a 750ti do it today? Because that just happens to be what my friend has who is upgrading their machine. Or would stronger hardware be required?
Thanks!