There have been a lot recommendations for the Western Digital Caviar 640GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache Hard Drive over the Seagate Barracuda 500GB 7200 RPM 32MB Cache. They are both price around the same with the WD being a little more. I’ve read some posts where people swear by the WD speed and price per GB ratio.
Since they are both made by reputable company, wouldn’t the Seagate with the 32MB Cache be a better and faster hard drive than the WD leaving the 140GB extra aside?
Since they are both made by reputable company, wouldn’t the Seagate with the 32MB Cache be a better and faster hard drive than the WD leaving the 140GB extra aside?