3.5ghz! oh my!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Hmm I guess you missed his signature...

I'll respect your comments & opinions, even if i disagree with them, <b>Provided you display maturity.</b>

--
It's Princess Leia, the yodel of my life. Give me my sweater back or I'll play the guitar.
 
That is what Intel needs to do is to really turn up the speed instead of milking it like they have been. I bet Intel hates the rather low prices on their cpu's compared to yester years, all caused by AMD. Well I hope to see a 3 Ghz Northwood straight out the door, skip all those meaningless speed steps 😡 . Think of this way, going from 200mhz to 300mhz is the same percentage difference as going from 2ghz to 3ghz 😱 . Now who in the right mind would have gone from 200mhz to 220 mhz and added an extra $500 on the price tag? eh? Which obviously would be the same speed percentage difference between 2ghz to 2.2ghz. Until Intel can separate their processors from AMD's performance wise Intel should continue their downward slope :frown: .
 
Right on!

And Iam risking being abused here!

Skater dude chill..
Why the need to be always abusing people?
Its very undignifying of you to respond like that, anywonder they throw it straight back at you.

Dont take this the wrong way!
I think your easily flamed and they will keep at you until you either learn to put a handle on it or go.. Now I know your thinking words like "idiot, ignorant, stupid, or whatever" to call me, but try for once not using them ok... :wink:




~Burnt my cookie overclocking~
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by scotty3303 on 09/04/01 00:27 AM.</EM></FONT></P>