4670 or 9600 GT?

quattro04

Distinguished
Aug 24, 2008
78
0
18,640
just wanna ask for your opinions. i've seen benchmarks on both but still can't decide on which card to buy. i'm not a hardcore gamer. just want to play with decent framerates. i mostly use my PC for surfing and watching movies

I will be gaming at 1280x1024 res but will be upgrading to a 22" screen.

my specs are:

E6550 stock
3 GB DDR2 PC6400
8500 GT 512MB
520 W PSU
17" CRT will be upgrading to 22" or 24" LCD
 

itheral

Distinguished
Oct 15, 2006
129
0
18,680
I'm gonna vote for the 4670, as the performance is similar, but the 4670 uses less power, has dx10.1, and the video performance is generally considered better on ATI/AMD cards.
 
Yeah, looking at some benchmarks it kinda a toss up between the two. I bought the 9600GT when it came out. If the HD4670 was sold at that time, I would have bought instead for my HTPC since it uses slightly less power and I've been mostly using ATI cards.

My last nVidia card before the 9600GT was the GeForce 4200 Ti years ago.
 

quattro04

Distinguished
Aug 24, 2008
78
0
18,640
thanks for the suggestions. what about the software included? ATI has avivo but what about nvidia?
can i CF the 4670 with higher 4xxx cards?
 

deltapapazulu

Distinguished
Oct 3, 2006
57
0
18,640
There have been stability problems with the nvidia cards, especially in Oblivion. I have a 9600gt and would get too many crashes on Oblivion to play the game. I miss my Radeon x800xl. Rock freaking solid. But it was just too weak for the new games so I loaned it to my sister to play WOW. Also my year+ old 9600gt gives me crashes in BF2. It is a PNY. Other hardware is a P5QL Pro ASUS board and E8400 INTEL CPU and 2x 2GB GSKILL RAM. There is no doubt in my mind that the issues I've been having in BF2 and Oblivion are due to the instability of this video card. I will probably never buy an Nvidia card again.
 

jennyh

Splendid
The 9600gt is the faster card. Tbh, the 4670 was overpriced to start with and still is. Although it's definitely a gaming card, it is pretty much the worst gaming card you can buy.

I seriously recommend saving up another $20 and moving into a different league of card altogether. However, if you really dont play many games at all then the 4670 is for me the cutoff point of what is and is not acceptable for a gaming card.
 

xtreme57

Distinguished
May 30, 2009
15
0
18,510
i would choose the 4670 any day ..same performance low power consumption(no need of any branded psu ) and cheaper......this article explains it best
http://pcgamersera.com/2009/05/ati-4670/
 

okini

Distinguished
Oct 1, 2009
45
0
18,530
HD 4670 HANDS DOWN. Even the HD 4650 is similar to the 9600GT and the HD 4670 pisses all over both of them for a cheaper price! than the 9600GT.
 

ohiou_grad_06

Distinguished
I have a 9600gt, none of the issues some others report. However, I know my 22 inch can do 1680x1050 resolution. If I were you, up your budget to maybe go for the 4850 at just under 100 bucks. It's not that the 9600gt is bad, but at times I find myself turning down settings a little at my full res to get better performance, or pulling the resolution down a little.