Windows 8.1 64
SSD
Intel i7-4790K (Not overclocked and won't be)
16 GB RAM (2 sticks vengeance ddr3)
Motherboard GIGABYTE Z97-HD3 LGA 1150 rev 2.0
GeForce GTX 1050ti 4GB not overclocked and won't be
EVGA supernova 650 Watt G2 80 plus Gold.
.. I don't want to mess with overclocking anything...
I have a 27" LED 1920x1080 samsung s27a350h. 2ms , 16.7m color support.
https://www.samsung.com/us/computer/monitors/LS27A350HS/ZA-specs
It's been good but it doesn't have a VESA mount for the articulating arm I just bought. I did buy a Non-VESA clamping adapter which claimed to fit up to 27" but it can't fit this Samsung. So I'm buying a new monitor.
I see some refurbished 4K 27" monitors for around $200 and that's around my budget.
But then I'm seeing people say the 1050ti 4GB can't really run games @ 4K with high FPS. Video would be fine but not games. I understand what FPS means but honestly I never tried to tweak FPS. I just play the game at default FPS but an older game I will max out the graphics options basically unless it causes an obvious problem. I play random genre games, not aiming at any particular game/genre but I think higher FPS would be best for all genres.
Anyway, I don't really feel like dropping $750+ on a better GPU since I don't think GPU prices dropped yet and I kinda just got this 1050ti 4GB about a year ago.
If I do buy a 4K 27" monitor with this set up, will it be WORSE than just using a 1080 monitor? Or can I change the 4K monitor to simply run at 1080p until I upgrade GPU? (but for only in-game and not video where it would run 4K video fine), Or would this process basically be automated if I just hook up a 4K monitor and run a game and then watch 4K video?
I know low response time is good (2s or less) and higher refresh rate is better (at least 144Hz) so I'm basically just looking for those specs in 4K refurbished/used for around $200.
But if it will make games worse than just getting a monitor with the same specs I already have (but with VESA) then I might just get another ~$125 used 1080p if a 4K would be a net negative without a better GPU.
Thanks in advance!!
SSD
Intel i7-4790K (Not overclocked and won't be)
16 GB RAM (2 sticks vengeance ddr3)
Motherboard GIGABYTE Z97-HD3 LGA 1150 rev 2.0
GeForce GTX 1050ti 4GB not overclocked and won't be
EVGA supernova 650 Watt G2 80 plus Gold.
.. I don't want to mess with overclocking anything...
I have a 27" LED 1920x1080 samsung s27a350h. 2ms , 16.7m color support.
https://www.samsung.com/us/computer/monitors/LS27A350HS/ZA-specs
It's been good but it doesn't have a VESA mount for the articulating arm I just bought. I did buy a Non-VESA clamping adapter which claimed to fit up to 27" but it can't fit this Samsung. So I'm buying a new monitor.
I see some refurbished 4K 27" monitors for around $200 and that's around my budget.
But then I'm seeing people say the 1050ti 4GB can't really run games @ 4K with high FPS. Video would be fine but not games. I understand what FPS means but honestly I never tried to tweak FPS. I just play the game at default FPS but an older game I will max out the graphics options basically unless it causes an obvious problem. I play random genre games, not aiming at any particular game/genre but I think higher FPS would be best for all genres.
Anyway, I don't really feel like dropping $750+ on a better GPU since I don't think GPU prices dropped yet and I kinda just got this 1050ti 4GB about a year ago.
If I do buy a 4K 27" monitor with this set up, will it be WORSE than just using a 1080 monitor? Or can I change the 4K monitor to simply run at 1080p until I upgrade GPU? (but for only in-game and not video where it would run 4K video fine), Or would this process basically be automated if I just hook up a 4K monitor and run a game and then watch 4K video?
I know low response time is good (2s or less) and higher refresh rate is better (at least 144Hz) so I'm basically just looking for those specs in 4K refurbished/used for around $200.
But if it will make games worse than just getting a monitor with the same specs I already have (but with VESA) then I might just get another ~$125 used 1080p if a 4K would be a net negative without a better GPU.
Thanks in advance!!
Last edited: