7300 GS Benckmark

[DGriffin]

Does anybody have a benchmark for the 7300gs? Compared to the 6200tc and the 6600. :?: 😀

 

[parlee]

no but i hear its perforamnce will be somewhat near the 6200... probably being beat by a 6600.... but this is just what my memory says, i think toms may have had this, or some1 posted it, either way thats what i remember hearing

 

[ikjadoon]

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2699&p=3

Doesn't compare it with a 6600, but getting a little less than 30FPS on 800X600 speaks for itself, though it's ATI counterpart is faster.

 

[DGriffin]

That's interesting, I have a 6200tc, Athlon 64 3200, 1 GB of ram, a sata hard drive, And I get at least 30 FPS on Battlefield 2 at 1024x768 no AA. Thanks for the info. 😀

 

[parlee]

doubtable... ur prob playing 16 man servers... did u use somthing to cap the fps? besides just looking and guessing... if so id like to see a SS, considering they used a fx55 and a gig of nice memory...

 

[DGriffin]

I was playing with 16 bots, single player, 1024x768, terrain high, effects med, geometry med, texture high, lighting med, dynamic shadows med, dynamic light med, texture filtering high, no AA, view distance scale 90%, no vsync, and whats SS?

 

[Heyyou27]

I play on 1280x1024 8XSSAA 16XAF with all details on the highest. Too bad the game still isn't fun.

 

[parlee]

i duno what they did, im assuming a demo, and that isnt max settings, thats considered medium... SS = screenshot of ur framerate ingame

 

[purelithium]

He never said "Max settings" he just said no AA...

 

[parlee]

terrain high, effects med, geometry med, texture high, lighting med, dynamic shadows med, dynamic light med, texture filtering high, no AA, view distance scale 90%, no vsync, all of that is medium, except for textures and terrain, thats considered medium setting, i dont thik u can argue with that... of course ull probably try

 

[DGriffin]

How do you get it to show the fps? Then I will set it all to high and see what I get. 😀

 

[ikjadoon]

Press the console button, right underneath the Escape. Type in:

renderer.drawfps 1

~Ibrahim~

 

[DGriffin]

Ok, cool, thanks, ill try that. 😀

 

[DGriffin]

Low movement, sat is rotating - This one is kind of hard to see but it is 23.8 FPS

Med movement, tank and guy running - 17.1 FPS

High movement, tank moving, other tank blew up, two guys hit the ground, I'm running - 15.3 FPS

This is with all settings set to high, no AA 1024,768.
16 bots Gulf of oman (settings and map used in the demo)
BTW, if I just looked at a wall, could see nothing else, and nobody was near me I would get about 28 fps.

 

[purelithium]

That's "barely playable" in my opinion...

 

[parlee]

thats unplayable and half of waht u said it was, so u really want "unplayable" frames in heated situations? that makes gaming very frustrating, right when u get to the fun part, u get killed from frame lag, id knock the settings to medium/low for a more fun gaming experience

 

[ikjadoon]

Agreed. I'd rather play at ultra low settings with solid FPS rather than ok settings with lag everytime someone comes near me.

~Ibrahim~

 

[DGriffin]

I do play at med settings and I get 25-30 FPS, I just turned up the graphics to show what FPS my card got on high settings. 😀

 

[taiho]

thats unplayable and half of waht u said it was, so u really want "unplayable" frames in heated situations? that makes gaming very frustrating, right when u get to the fun part, u get killed from frame lag, id knock the settings to medium/low for a more fun gaming experience

I have to jump in and ask this one thing:
When did he actually say he played at high? You don't read it seems 😛 He only said No AA, then he said after you started talking about High settings that he was using Med settings, and he sends SS just to show how it works on High, and then you argue about him having half the FPS he "claimed" he had...of course he has, he was playing High when he had 30 on Med 😛

Sorry for posting this, it just get's to me when people argue about stuff when they didn't read.

PS. Thanks to this post I now know it seems to be better to get myself a 6600 instead of a 7300. DS.

 

[parlee]

"I was playing with 16 bots, single player, 1024x768, terrain high, effects med, geometry med, texture high, lighting med, dynamic shadows med, dynamic light med, texture filtering high, no AA, view distance scale 90%, no vsync, and whats SS?"

thats the settings he plays at with 30 fps.... with almost no movement, with those fps id play at low just so id be able to shoot without my game freezing, but thats just me... i duno tho appearently with u games are only fun if they look good...

 

[DGriffin]

I might have misunderstood what you said, but are you saying 30 FPS is bad? And I agree low res, and low detail with high frame rates is better than high res and detail and low FPS. 😀

 

[parlee]

yea ur idea is the same as mine, i said 30 fps is unplayable.. at least in a game like bf2, especailly if u can drop the details a bit for much higher frames... bf2 is the kinda game that u should have at least 50fps in heated situations to do well...

 

[DGriffin]

Thank for the suggestion I'll keep that in mind