30% in the eyes of intel fanbots, can you read the graph? There are single core results. If you are not aware 1185g7 is 28w at base frequency, 45w at turbo. Still two times slower with more power.
Btw 0.5 slower is same as two times slower which mean the faster is 100% faster.
Strictly, the statement is not true, but your concept is correct. "0.5 x Base speed of the AMD chip" or "the Intel chip is 0.5 x the Speed of the AMD chip" is more like the claim meant. But yes, it does equate to the meaning of AMD is 2x the Speed of the Intel chip in concept.
0.5 x Slower is not the same as 2x slower, it is mathematically wrong. it cannot be 0.5 and 2 times slower. It is either 2x faster for the AMD or 0.5 times the speed of the AMD.
It is also Hyperbolic in that these speeds are relative only to Benchmarks or potentially un-optimised software. So it is untrue in the sense that you can apply this stat across the board with all applications and OS's.
We get the point, you are an AMD fanboi and the other guy is an Intel Flunkie, but who really cares anymore.
I supported AMD while it was the underdog, and with its low prices. But clearly they are now turning into the same as Intel with Greed with pricing. So AMD and Intel are now looking to be the same with ripping off consumers with Bloated prices, purely based on theoretical benchmark performances and cores.
I am happy AMD is kicking azz again, but unhappy to see the new pricing model.
https://www.tomshardware.com/uk/news/leaked-rocket-lake-reviews-hint-amd-has-nothing-to-worry-about