G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsme.general (More info?)
Mike:
To find clarity in this subject, I looked it up by "googling".
The computer doesn't have ten fingers, as we do and therefore using the
figure 10 in our decimal system, or fractional values.
It has only "two" fingers, due to the transistor technology, which are
off/on or 0/1.Henceforth the expression "binary", where times ten is
translated into times two.
Anyone wanting to know more, is welcome to "google" themselves. I like math,
but not that much.
Harry.
"Mike M" <No_Spam@Corned_Beef.Only> wrote in message
news:ucixt9jLFHA.436@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> webster72n <hbethke@copper.net> wrote:
>
> > My question would be, 'what is the need for this "binary math".
>
> Simply because otherwise you would be unable to understand the reason for
> the different numbers reported. That is why a drive sold as 40GB appears
> in Windows Explorer as being around 37GB.
>
> > this differential in reporting the 'size', which should be 'actual',
> > shouldn't it?
> > Just a question on this subject, mind you.
> --
> Mike Maltby MS-MVP
> mike.maltby@gmail.com
>
>
>
Mike:
To find clarity in this subject, I looked it up by "googling".
The computer doesn't have ten fingers, as we do and therefore using the
figure 10 in our decimal system, or fractional values.
It has only "two" fingers, due to the transistor technology, which are
off/on or 0/1.Henceforth the expression "binary", where times ten is
translated into times two.
Anyone wanting to know more, is welcome to "google" themselves. I like math,
but not that much.
Harry.
"Mike M" <No_Spam@Corned_Beef.Only> wrote in message
news:ucixt9jLFHA.436@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> webster72n <hbethke@copper.net> wrote:
>
> > My question would be, 'what is the need for this "binary math".
>
> Simply because otherwise you would be unable to understand the reason for
> the different numbers reported. That is why a drive sold as 40GB appears
> in Windows Explorer as being around 37GB.
>
> > this differential in reporting the 'size', which should be 'actual',
> > shouldn't it?
> > Just a question on this subject, mind you.
> --
> Mike Maltby MS-MVP
> mike.maltby@gmail.com
>
>
>