about display/texture quality,,amd is better than nvidia

[a1blaster]

disregard the features and technologies....lets just talk about display quality only
i notice amd's display has rich colors and more vibrant...i don't know to you guys but amd is better than nvidia...agree??

 

[Quaddro]

There is no difference in image quality based on the brand of card you buy. The days of 2D image quality being a function of particular graphics cards are long gone for most people. When CRTs were popular, it was something that mattered as the quality of the RAMDAC controlled the quality of the analog VGA output. Thus different cards, even with the same chipset, could potentially produce different 2D image quality.

However LCDs and DVI have changed all that. The signal is fully digital from the OS, to the card, to the monitor right up until the individual sub pixels are finally lit up. This removes any quality differences from card outputs, since they are outputting a completely accurate digital signal. The only time they change anything is when instructed to by a change to their LUTs from the user, OS, application, and so on.

What that all means is the conclusion is pretty clear: There are many good reasons to buy team green or team red, but 2D image quality is not one of them. They are precisely the same.

Color Test

 

[a1blaster]

i have 7750,gt 520 and 660 ti...
520 and 660 ti display look pale
7750 looks vibrant and colorful
i won't buy nvidia gpu again...

 

[bystander]

Do you connect using a VGA cable?

The only difference between the two in graphics vibrancy, if using digital, would only be a setting issue, which can be adjusted. If using VGA, then things would be different.