Source drive (500gb Hitachi) had 2 primary partitions, First partition is 241gb (141gb used) bootable OS (Windows 7 64bit). Second partition is 223gb (208.2gb used) Storage partition (media).
After True Image, both destination partitions are primary partitions, but First Partition is only using 135gb (6gb less than source), and second partition is only using 198gb (10.2gb less than source).
I was under the impression that a disk image should be an exact copy. I am currently still using the source (Hitachi) hard drive because the destination hard drives first partition (Windows) does not show as a bootable partition in Windows Explorer.
My questions are am i actually missing data or did Acronis write the data more efficiently (less wasted space) on the new drive? Shouldn't the cloned OS partition show as bootable in Windows Explorer?
The reason I upgraded HD's is the Hitachi began crashing with Windows reporting a S.M.A.R.T. failure.
Thank you for your help, Fred
After True Image, both destination partitions are primary partitions, but First Partition is only using 135gb (6gb less than source), and second partition is only using 198gb (10.2gb less than source).
I was under the impression that a disk image should be an exact copy. I am currently still using the source (Hitachi) hard drive because the destination hard drives first partition (Windows) does not show as a bootable partition in Windows Explorer.
My questions are am i actually missing data or did Acronis write the data more efficiently (less wasted space) on the new drive? Shouldn't the cloned OS partition show as bootable in Windows Explorer?
The reason I upgraded HD's is the Hitachi began crashing with Windows reporting a S.M.A.R.T. failure.
Thank you for your help, Fred