AMD 64 3200+ MANCHESTER?????wth

[style69]

The newest version of CPU-Z 1.32 is out...checke dit and it says my CPU is a manchester? (not a winchester....a MANCHESTER) :? :?

DIdnt even know that there are 3200+ manchesters......so dissappointed that i dont have a venice eventhough my ID says it is one...

any ways doesnt anyone else have a manchester if so whats the overclocking limit...? right now im at 2.4GHZ

 

[MadModMike]

This is interesting. You have started about 3 or 4 others threads pertaining to your CPU being some other core, first you didn't know what it was, than you found out it was a Venice, than you asked about OC'ing a Venice, now you're saying you have a Manchester according to CPU-Z while before it was something else? I ask you to please stop starting these kinds of threads about the same CPU over and over.

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time

 

[style69]

Well im sorry ...

I did open and look at my CPU......found the code adn checked it to be a venice but today the enw CPU-z version's telling me that its a Manchester?

IM not spamming or anything but i really am confused.

Thanks. i apologize for any bad posts.

 

[khha4113]

There is something wrong with the new revision 1.32 of CPU-Z. My X2 3800 is no longer Manchester core but Toledo!

 

[brainysmurf]

The Manchester core is only available with lower clocked X2 cpus. My X2 3800+ is has two Manchester cores. The X2 4800+ is a Toledo core.
There are no AMD 64 3200+ "Manchester" cores. That animal does not exist.
Go by the VIN number.
What you're reading in CPU-Z is a software glitch, an identification erro.
What you have is a Venice.

 

[brainysmurf]

Cool, I learned something new today. :lol:

 

[ltcommander_data]

The only way that CPU-Z could be right is that you have a reject Manchester core. One of the cores wasn't working so they just disabled it and sold it with one working core as a 3200+. Since the speed and cache amount match the X2 3800+ Manchester this is a possibility. Intel does this all the time with processors that don't meet spec so it isn't unreasonable to assume AMD would do the same thing. The performance would be the same and it saves AMD plenty of money.

 

[style69]

means it has limited overclocking potential...?

 

[pat]

Yup.. some people out here definitively need to get a life...