Here's a summary from the above reviews (compared to 3rd gen Intel. 4th gen is even better):
1) "I've gotten too picky about heat and noise over time, and gaming performance matters a lot to me..."
2) "AMD remains deeply uncompetitive in primarily single threaded applications such as games without offering the significant benefits in multi-threaded applications you’d expect from a chip boasting eight cores."
3) "Would FX-8350 be my first choice in a new build, though? Probably not. Although I’m impressed by the work AMD’s architects have done in the last year, performance remains too workload-dependent."
The FX-8350 just doesn't make sense as a gaming CPU if you've done your homework on how it performs on average. While it may be slightly cheaper than a good i5 it's not worth it if looking at the TOTAL COST as the difference on performance in some games is HUGE (over 50% in some cases).
If building a new system with a GTX970 that kind of money deserves an i5-4690K setup.
Look, it has 8 cores. Things that use many cores would benefit, but my point is the SINGLE-THREADED applications is a bottleneck. Games are. Most use only up to 4.
Look, it has 8 cores. Things that use many cores would benefit, but my point is the SINGLE-THREADED applications is a bottleneck. Games are. Most use only up to 4.
Using 4 is still multithreading just to less of a degree.