i was going to read the article, i actually read the release when these were debuted by toms. i skipped into this article right to the benchmark configuration and looking at the hardware and then this:"Benchmark ConfigurationGaming"the second i saw this i automatically knew this new APU was hardware only comparable to 2005. my second thought was why the waste of modern gpu windows 8 and 2100+mhz what ever ram. 3rd thought but should have been Tom's hardware sole and only focus APU = mobile, instead what did Tom's do? took AMD's money for a review and called intel and did an under the table deal with Intel for some more cash to pit this made for mobile market (laptop/tablet) to pit this part against a hgher end Intel performance desktop part.if AMD is not feeling righteous indignation, then the people in charge of their marketing department and the corporate execs must be led by the neanderthals or ATI execs (the ones who were in charge of Ati driver approval)4th thought Toms has no idea of a comparable way to benchmark this, which i can easily solve by saying " pit this against any i5m / i7m mobile processor in any laptop and not plugged into the wall, because part of the test is to see how far down the battery goes in terms of the benching and how many recharges it takes to complete as well as how much time. recharging time included as the stop watch never stops until the benchmarks are all complete!seriously Tom's if you're going to do an APU review just pit the 1.3 Ghz snap dragon processors in there vs the the 4Ghz i7 3970x as long as you are making a completely worthless and irrelevant review. oh and a leading desktop Intel and AMD CPU from 2005 as long as 2005 era benchmarks are being used.i'm shocked Chris even let this article happen, let alone the test. seriously comparing apples to sunflower seed was a great idea? SERIOUSLY. this damages readers respect and Toms credibility and relevance in the tech world. i am beyond disappointed, this is just the last nail in the coffin i have for tomshardware.com. i thought the 2013 Q4 system builder marathon was bad just looking at the budget base but now being jaded enough to see it for what it really was = a way for vendor publicity and last ditch measure to save toms sinking page hits numbers, but knowing how toms works it was also a way to put parts into cherry picked _ _ _ kissers reward.i think i'll take up being a political media critic from now on. same b.s. but more challenging to find the faults/violations. should be able to get a journalism degree out of it, only need to know how to use spell check these days.'We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true.'