I guess they could just have these CCDs still in inventory, potentially really good bins and EPYC candidates and they are now clearing them out at the best possible price.
Just increasing the number on the chips helps an illusion of getting a slightly improved chip.
And they do get better later in the game, I still fondly remember some golden bin 45nm Penryns sold as Xeons which clocked incredibly high yet barely got warm, while I also had an early one that would do zero overclock and ran much hotter: truly a world apart!
And yes, it's a good one as I can attest, even with a 7945HX number on top that I got on a Minisforum board at economy pricing.
I'd really just like to know if they were already packaged for the mobile form factor or are freshly assembled to hit that popular mobile-on-desktop market. While it has always been a very good choice for a mobile workstation with a potent GPU, that's both a small market and it was way too dominated by Intel Raptor lakes: AMD might have just made too many fully assembled Dragon Range CPUs, or or be using a late opportunity...
And that is mostly just curiosity, I'd love to better understand the logistics involved: AMD has a tons of potential flexibility deciding the fate of CCDs early or late, but not all options might actually be economically attractive. And while in theory they could package late, those production lines also may not be that easy to spin up or adjust between server/desktop/mobile lines, giving much less real-world flexbility than the modular approach seems to offer.
And the they could also be late wafer starts for both CCDs and IODs for all we know: perhaps they come with huge rebates from TSMC on these older nodes now.
So many options, so few insights!
I see you don't have a clue, either, but I'd think you're better equipped to find out than me.