Good afternoon. I was just told by someone that the FX-6300 will bottleneck the GTX 750 Ti. To my knowledge, there is not any potential severe bottleneck for this card and CPU combination. I only foresee issues (and minimal ones at that) with poorly-optimized and very CPU-intensive games. Would someone of authority please elaborate on possible bottlenecks, if any, as I would like to have a better understanding of why this person would make this statement.
Please don't discuss another CPU option for this card. I am aware of other CPU options. I would just like the issue at hand to be commented on. If you absolutely must comment on CPUs, mention which i3s, if any, are all-around better (read faster) than the FX-6300. This person also made the statement that his 'i3 is faster' and implied that there would be lesser of a bottleneck with his i3. I assume by i3 he meant an i3-3220. The benchmarks I've seen, though be it a while since I have looked, showed the i3-3220 and FX-6300 performing very similarly and trading blows for certain games that were optimized differently. It is also possible he was speaking of the i3-4130. For an i3 to completely beat a FX-6300, I assumed the software/game needed to be solely single-threaded. Even then, I thought that situation didn't occur often enough to be of consideration versus the number of integer cores; multi-threading; overclocking; and the price/value ratio of the FX-6300.
Thanks for reading this semi-long rant. I look forward to comments being made.
■ This setup in question is at 720p by the way, nothing higher than 1366 x 768 resolution.
Also, If this is more pertinent in the CPU sub-forum, please move it there.
Edit: Looking back at it, I believe this does belong in the CPU sub-forum instead. If a mod catches this thread, please move it appropriately.
Please don't discuss another CPU option for this card. I am aware of other CPU options. I would just like the issue at hand to be commented on. If you absolutely must comment on CPUs, mention which i3s, if any, are all-around better (read faster) than the FX-6300. This person also made the statement that his 'i3 is faster' and implied that there would be lesser of a bottleneck with his i3. I assume by i3 he meant an i3-3220. The benchmarks I've seen, though be it a while since I have looked, showed the i3-3220 and FX-6300 performing very similarly and trading blows for certain games that were optimized differently. It is also possible he was speaking of the i3-4130. For an i3 to completely beat a FX-6300, I assumed the software/game needed to be solely single-threaded. Even then, I thought that situation didn't occur often enough to be of consideration versus the number of integer cores; multi-threading; overclocking; and the price/value ratio of the FX-6300.
Thanks for reading this semi-long rant. I look forward to comments being made.
■ This setup in question is at 720p by the way, nothing higher than 1366 x 768 resolution.
Also, If this is more pertinent in the CPU sub-forum, please move it there.
Edit: Looking back at it, I believe this does belong in the CPU sub-forum instead. If a mod catches this thread, please move it appropriately.