AMD has better position to go 'nano'

[DScott79]

After reading through all of this it seems each person is quick to criticize. Let us not forget that whatever they use CNT's for it will be a revolution. I'm not quite sure how quickly it will take of in the desktop segment but it may explode in the mobile and server segments.

It will be useful and whoever gets their hands dirty first will gain some serious market share.

 

[fedaykin]

I personally like Intel's products, but AMD is american, so I'm rooting for the home team. I'd like to see them crush Intel, but I don't jump ship so easily.

I don't want to jump in the middle of this "argument", but I'll take Caboose-1's suggestion that "If you KNOW FOR A FACT that someone has their information wrong, then you should help them fix it politely"; what I have just quoted suggests that Intel is not an American company, but this is entirely false. Intel may be "multinational" as Wikipedia says but it is most-definitely based and started in the U.S. Just thought I'd clear that up, not looking to pick a fight 😉

 

[endyen]

Weird thought of the day. nanotubes are analog.
No, it doesn't just mean that Intel and Amd wont need fanboys, because they could make thier own more-ons.
For memory, it starts with programed decay, to reduce latencies.
With a little control, mem could hold more than a single one or zero.