AMD Ryzen 7 1800X CPU Review

[nikoli707]

the r5 1500x is a bit less than 40% faster than the fx8350, more like 30% if you figure in the safe temp average overclock with a hyper 212. but threads and price are king with ryzen.

 

[Radu-Mihai]

My interest in visiting this site was to see how Ryzen is doing, compared to i7 7700k, when in comes to Adobe Photoshop/Illustrator, 3ds Max, and other creative suits.
After reading this article I have come to conclusion that for what I need 7700k is better, however I heard tomshardware had biased reviews so I kept searching. I stumbled upon these results, translated from Serbian to English:
What do you have to say about it ?

http://www.bozzabench.com/Tests/TestView/tabid/95/id/1703/currentpage/13/Maticne-ploce-cipsetovi-procesori/AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-Adobe-Photoshop-CC-performanse.aspx

http://www.bozzabench.com/Tests/TestView/tabid/95/id/1703/currentpage/10/Maticne-ploce-cipsetovi-procesori/AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-3ds-Max-Cinema-4D-Blender.aspx

 

[Crashman]

My interest in visiting this site was to see how Ryzen is doing, compared to i7 7700k, when in comes to Adobe Photoshop/Illustrator, 3ds Max, and other creative suits.
After reading this article I have come to conclusion that for what I need 7700k is better, however I heard tomshardware had biased reviews so I kept searching. I stumbled upon these results, translated from Serbian to English:
What do you have to say about it ?

http://www.bozzabench.com/Tests/TestView/tabid/95/id/1703/currentpage/13/Maticne-ploce-cipsetovi-procesori/AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-Adobe-Photoshop-CC-performanse.aspx

Tom's]http://www.bozzabench.com/Tests/TestView/tabid/95/id/1703/currentpage/10/Maticne-ploce-cipsetovi-procesori/AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-3ds-Max-Cinema-4D-Blender.aspx

Tom's Hardware is biased in favor of running a series of tests and writing about the actual results of those tests. There has been a big uproar by members of the community who think the test should have been specifically configured to help AMD win, but that would be bias. I've heard that post-launch optimizations are completely changing AMD's standing in some benchmarks...months after this was written.

 

[-Fran-]

Tom's Hardware is biased in favor of running a series of tests and writing about the actual results of those tests. There has been a big uproar by members of the community who think the test should have been specifically configured to help AMD win, but that would be bias. I've heard that post-launch optimizations are completely changing AMD's standing in some benchmarks...months after this was written.

Updated review confirmed? 😀

Cheers! 😛

 

[Crashman]

Tom's Hardware is biased in favor of running a series of tests and writing about the actual results of those tests. There has been a big uproar by members of the community who think the test should have been specifically configured to help AMD win, but that would be bias. I've heard that post-launch optimizations are completely changing AMD's standing in some benchmarks...months after this was written.

Updated review confirmed? 😀

Cheers! 😛

Jacob Terkelsen is working on adding updated benchmarks to his AMD Motherboard reviews, but he doesn't have the Intel hardware. My guess is that you'll see updated comparison data when a new CPU comes out

 

[-Fran-]

Tom's Hardware is biased in favor of running a series of tests and writing about the actual results of those tests. There has been a big uproar by members of the community who think the test should have been specifically configured to help AMD win, but that would be bias. I've heard that post-launch optimizations are completely changing AMD's standing in some benchmarks...months after this was written.

Updated review confirmed? 😀

Cheers! 😛

Jacob Terkelsen is working on adding updated benchmarks to his AMD Motherboard reviews, but he doesn't have the Intel hardware. My guess is that you'll see updated comparison data when a new CPU comes out

Is that a very subtle hint at the ThreadRipper imminent review? 😛

Cheers!

 

[PaulAlcorn]

Tom's Hardware is biased in favor of running a series of tests and writing about the actual results of those tests. There has been a big uproar by members of the community who think the test should have been specifically configured to help AMD win, but that would be bias. I've heard that post-launch optimizations are completely changing AMD's standing in some benchmarks...months after this was written.

Updated review confirmed? 😀

Cheers! 😛

Jacob Terkelsen is working on adding updated benchmarks to his AMD Motherboard reviews, but he doesn't have the Intel hardware. My guess is that you'll see updated comparison data when a new CPU comes out

Is that a very subtle hint at the ThreadRipper imminent review? 😛

Cheers!

We have been retesting the Ryzen models with each new review, but have been working further down the stack in the process (Ryzen 5 models). I retested the 1800X just this week for an upcoming piece, and results (along with memory overclocking) are better in a variety of the benchmarks. It's definitely a challenge to keep up with such a fast-evolving platform.

For now, the most current 1800X results are in the Ryzen 7 1700 review. http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-1700-cpu-review,5009.html