AMD Ryzen 7 1800X CPU Review

[nikoli707]

the r5 1500x is a bit less than 40% faster than the fx8350, more like 30% if you figure in the safe temp average overclock with a hyper 212. but threads and price are king with ryzen.

 

[Radu-Mihai]

My interest in visiting this site was to see how Ryzen is doing, compared to i7 7700k, when in comes to Adobe Photoshop/Illustrator, 3ds Max, and other creative suits.
After reading this article I have come to conclusion that for what I need 7700k is better, however I heard tomshardware had biased reviews so I kept searching. I stumbled upon these results, translated from Serbian to English:
What do you have to say about it ?

http://www.bozzabench.com/Tests/TestView/tabid/95/id/1703/currentpage/13/Maticne-ploce-cipsetovi-procesori/AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-Adobe-Photoshop-CC-performanse.aspx

http://www.bozzabench.com/Tests/TestView/tabid/95/id/1703/currentpage/10/Maticne-ploce-cipsetovi-procesori/AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-3ds-Max-Cinema-4D-Blender.aspx

 

[Crashman]

My interest in visiting this site was to see how Ryzen is doing, compared to i7 7700k, when in comes to Adobe Photoshop/Illustrator, 3ds Max, and other creative suits.
After reading this article I have come to conclusion that for what I need 7700k is better, however I heard tomshardware had biased reviews so I kept searching. I stumbled upon these results, translated from Serbian to English:
What do you have to say about it ?

http://www.bozzabench.com/Tests/TestView/tabid/95/id/1703/currentpage/13/Maticne-ploce-cipsetovi-procesori/AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-Adobe-Photoshop-CC-performanse.aspx

Tom's]http://www.bozzabench.com/Tests/TestView/tabid/95/id/1703/currentpage/10/Maticne-ploce-cipsetovi-procesori/AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-3ds-Max-Cinema-4D-Blender.aspx

Tom's Hardware is biased in favor of running a series of tests and writing about the actual results of those tests. There has been a big uproar by members of the community who think the test should have been specifically configured to help AMD win, but that would be bias. I've heard that post-launch optimizations are completely changing AMD's standing in some benchmarks...months after this was written.

 

[-Fran-]

Tom's Hardware is biased in favor of running a series of tests and writing about the actual results of those tests. There has been a big uproar by members of the community who think the test should have been specifically configured to help AMD win, but that would be bias. I've heard that post-launch optimizations are completely changing AMD's standing in some benchmarks...months after this was written.

Updated review confirmed?

Cheers!

 

[Crashman]

Tom's Hardware is biased in favor of running a series of tests and writing about the actual results of those tests. There has been a big uproar by members of the community who think the test should have been specifically configured to help AMD win, but that would be bias. I've heard that post-launch optimizations are completely changing AMD's standing in some benchmarks...months after this was written.

Updated review confirmed?

Cheers!

Jacob Terkelsen is working on adding updated benchmarks to his AMD Motherboard reviews, but he doesn't have the Intel hardware. My guess is that you'll see updated comparison data when a new CPU comes out

 

[-Fran-]

Tom's Hardware is biased in favor of running a series of tests and writing about the actual results of those tests. There has been a big uproar by members of the community who think the test should have been specifically configured to help AMD win, but that would be bias. I've heard that post-launch optimizations are completely changing AMD's standing in some benchmarks...months after this was written.

Updated review confirmed?

Cheers!

Jacob Terkelsen is working on adding updated benchmarks to his AMD Motherboard reviews, but he doesn't have the Intel hardware. My guess is that you'll see updated comparison data when a new CPU comes out

Is that a very subtle hint at the ThreadRipper imminent review?

Cheers!

 

[PaulAlcorn]

Tom's Hardware is biased in favor of running a series of tests and writing about the actual results of those tests. There has been a big uproar by members of the community who think the test should have been specifically configured to help AMD win, but that would be bias. I've heard that post-launch optimizations are completely changing AMD's standing in some benchmarks...months after this was written.

Updated review confirmed?

Cheers!

Jacob Terkelsen is working on adding updated benchmarks to his AMD Motherboard reviews, but he doesn't have the Intel hardware. My guess is that you'll see updated comparison data when a new CPU comes out

Is that a very subtle hint at the ThreadRipper imminent review?

Cheers!

We have been retesting the Ryzen models with each new review, but have been working further down the stack in the process (Ryzen 5 models). I retested the 1800X just this week for an upcoming piece, and results (along with memory overclocking) are better in a variety of the benchmarks. It's definitely a challenge to keep up with such a fast-evolving platform.

For now, the most current 1800X results are in the Ryzen 7 1700 review. http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-1700-cpu-review,5009.html