joeblowsmynose
Distinguished
From base, sure. But from rated all core boost? Not by much. With Ryzen it is essentially better to just leave it be and use PBO.
As you said if you set an all core clock then power draw increases pretty insanely. I saw one review showing the 3950X at 4.3GHz match a 9980XE at stock.
I have no idea what Zen 3 will bring. I like anyone have to wait for its release and until then expect the same crap rumors as before like it will be a 32core 6GHz+ monster with 64 PCIe 5.0 lanes with 128GB of integrated HBM 3 memory on die.
All core boost is also pretty low on that chip at 3.2 I believe, which explains its low 65w TDP --- one core boost is 3.7 or 3.75 if you have a good cooler.
It was an amazing bang for buck CPU if you could get it on sale and like to OC.
I guess the 2700x is practically free these days, so that's the new bang for buck champ from AMD (and maybe r5 3600)
I'm excited at the cache changes in zen3 ... that might increase some gaming performance. (larger, unified L3)
Edit: just rechecked the boost stats here: https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/amd/ryzen_7/1700
3.7 (or 3.75) for two core boost and more than 2 core boosting is just 3.1. Anyone who didn't OC their 1700 is/was losing out on a lot of extra performance.
Last edited: