its like the article is trying to throw shade at AMD for no actual reason, the main point and real cause of the "lower" score is just the clocks of an early ES, yet the article makes it look like Strix its a complete disappointment and a "underwhelming" new Gen, i really dont get it, how TH allowed this article to be published in this "line" of argument.
That depends on if "the curve" is more linear or more curved.
If you look at older zen they scale very well in the start but then level out and don't get much faster no matter how much power you provide to them.
We will have to see how much better the new cores are.
Alder Lake’s Power Efficiency – A Complicated Picture
Reviews across the internet show Alder Lake getting very competitive performance with very high power consumption.chipsandcheese.com
Great! Show us a newer graph.
Yeah, intel also told us about 50% more MT performance at iso power, and it's even real but in the end only the max performance counts for reviewers.
Great! Show us a newer graph.
This is the newest that I know of, so this is the one I showed, also it's only to show that performance does not scale linearly and not to try and convince you that the new chip will be the same as the old.
You didn't even cut it out of the part you quoted, I did say "We will have to see how much better the new cores are."
Yeah, intel also told us about 50% more MT performance at iso power, and it's even real but in the end only the max performance counts for reviewers.
You have a problem with the graph that I showed so you search for it and if you find it I will use the new one from now on.
im too lazy to go search a graph from a vid just to rectify/update yours with a more evenly matched one, im just letting you know there are newer ones, plus i find odd the choices chipsandcheese made for that article, thats all.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram