So this card, which performance-wise competes with the Titan Z, continues to be priced so much cheaper than that card that it's not exactly clear to me how Nvidia can still sell the damn thing. It seems to me that the Titan Z is just ridiculously overpriced.
this should tell you how much the markup for these so called "dual gpu" cards is....i would really like to know much it really cost to manufacture these cards
Manufacturing is pennies on the dollar, its the cost of the RAM and GPU. I guess it depends on how RAM and GPU you can buy bulk... I would even speculate the RAM on higher end cards may cost more then the GPU!
that's still not worth it. this card is only 2 tiers higher than the 780ti on tomshardware's hierarchy chart, and that card drops to 630 on a regular basis. at full price, the 295x2 is more than twice the cost of two 780ti's.
uh, did you actually look at that chart? the 295x2 is the same or worse at 1440 and only slightly better at 4k.It has more performance than two 780ti's in SLI.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-r9-295x2-rev...
The only reason it is two places above the 780Ti and not more because faster cards between the two have not been invented to fill the space between them. The grid just lists cards in a straight order by which is better than which and which are equal or close to equal. It doesn't dhow the level of difference between any two points.
the 290x is one tier lower than the 780ti. the 780ti costs 630 to 715, and the 290x costs 500 to 800.The r9 290x trades punches and usually comes out on top when compared to the 780ti, the 290x is a 500-550$ card, The 780 ti is a 650 - 700 $ card.
the 295x2 is only 1000 on discount for a limited time, its full price is 1500, and the dual 780ti doesn't need extra water cooling to match performance.You show me a single place where buying dual 780 TI's using more power AND paying for the water cooling on it justifies the 400+$ difference between a 295 @ 1000$.