AMD Wants to Know What You'd Do With 48 Cores

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

azetec

Distinguished
Apr 30, 2009
45
0
18,530
The problem is not what we do with 48 Cores but what can that CPU do ? Can he render a full CGI movie in 3D Studio Max or Maya with awesome graphics like Avatar in less than 10 minutes ? Or can he render ultra-realistic 3xFullHD 1080p Stereoscopic Raytracing games with ultra-realistic Physics simulations at 120 FPS ?
 

zubair_61

Distinguished
Mar 8, 2010
1
0
18,510
I routinely use ten quad core computers clustered together for running my traffic models. It will be more efficient to have a single machine with 48 cores because my software allows explicit use of each core instead of just relying on the operating system. I can get a performace boost with that!
 

ceteras

Distinguished
Aug 26, 2008
156
0
18,680
48 cores? Windows 2008 server ?
Hell, first thing I'd put a linux on the damn beast, then do some neat parallel programming research, maybe implement some very powerful route planning/navigation system.
 
[citation][nom]dkcrogue[/nom]I'd use all that CPU power to compress data in real time as it is writen to HDD/SSD in order to increase throughput![/citation]
I think that's brilliant. Use the component that is most powerful to speed up the slowest.
 

stupiduser

Distinguished
Mar 8, 2010
2
0
18,510
I would follow in the footsteps of my hero Lazlo Hollyfield and use this system to fill out applications for every contest and giveaway.
 

icemunk

Distinguished
Aug 1, 2009
628
0
18,990
for some reason I think telling a chick you have a 48 core processor isn't going to do much to increase your chances of getting laid, actually probably quite the opposite.
 


depends on the chick i know a few that would be impressed, even fewer that are attractive :(
 

kokin

Distinguished
May 28, 2009
445
0
18,810
Most chicks just aren't into hardware. I know plenty who know how to use tons of different programs, but it's rare to find any that know hardware stuff.
 
I would see if AMD can make a product that beats Intell at the High end.

I loves me some AMD ( for the low/middle end), But come on, their most expensive Desktop CPU is 160$.

I realy want a 300$ AMD CPU to compete with the i7-930. Hopefully the Hex-Cores soming out with the 890FX can do that...
 

shurcooL

Distinguished
Oct 13, 2007
58
0
18,630
[citation][nom]drowned[/nom]Sell it, downgrade to a quad core i7, then use the profits for crossfire X 5970's.[/citation]
Hahahaha, this is so full of win. :p

Well, not for AMD.
 
G

Guest

Guest
I would Play Crysis, Then Donate it to Intel Because heaven knows they need it...
 

kokin

Distinguished
May 28, 2009
445
0
18,810
[citation][nom]ProelectronX[/nom]I would Play Crysis, Then Donate it to Intel Because heaven knows they need it...[/citation]
But Intel already made an 80-core CPU, so why bother?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Hey y'know maybe being able to open photoshop, a browser and my email at the same time and not having to wait while each program hangs - omy 17-980x - might be a bit too much to ask? I'm only trying to earn a living here after all. 1 core felt faster it seems.

I'll tell you what to do with 48 cores. Don't bother. How about a bit of energy into actually making real world multitasking a reality instead of flattering benchmarks on a chart that don't mean squat to me, here in the real world.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.