AMD's higher-end Navi 48 is smaller than both Navi 21 and Navi 31.
AMD's Navi 48 GPU pictured: around 390 mm2, targeting mainstream gamers : Read more
AMD's Navi 48 GPU pictured: around 390 mm2, targeting mainstream gamers : Read more
Good job to all involved!The article said:When AMD first showcased the Navi 48 GPU yesterday, it was presented as the company's Hawk Point Refresh processor. However, it certainly resembled the Navi 48 GPU from AMD's press materials, not a Hawk Point CPU. We asked AMD for clarification, but the company declined to comment.
In RDNA2, I got the sense that Infinity Cache was basically L2. I think you're right that RDNA3's MCDs are L3, though.Staying on-die for the L3 (excuse me, INFINITY CACHE) should be helpful for latency too.
Yeah even 5nm to 3nm was virtually zero scaling. However, it appears TSMC has had a breakthrough and 2nm will see the first tangible improvement in SRAM scaling since we went from 10nm to 7nm. Even 7nm to 5nm was not great.Actually 7nm to 5nm still managed to maintain better SRAM scaling than 3nm did. Staying on-die for the L3 (excuse me, INFINITY CACHE) should be helpful for latency too.