Yes. That's true at least for one quarter of them in my approx. Latest days the hottest topic was if P4 is/isn't worth buying. IMHO right now obviously is not:
- it's more expensive than T-Bird and with few exceptions slower;
- it's strongly unbalanced exactly like the old K6 line from AMD (I mean it "prefers" some applications);
- if you buy one right you'll get stucked: Intel wants to abandon Socket423 and P4 in less than a year. That's a short life, don't you think?
- about the SSE2 story: if you are interested only in high performance then you should look for other platforms like Alpha. The users of the 80x86 platform always put a big price on compatibility. Otherwise how do you explain that we are still working on 8086 compatible machines? SSE2 right now is NOTHING. My guess is that it will be important in 1 year but in 1 year you will have much better alternatives from Intel.
You may argue that P4 has a lot of potential. IMHO the architecture of P4 has a lot of potential but the P4 doesn't. You should wait at least for another stepping (right now it has 40 bugs, many of them without "workaround" - I wonder if companies will ever accept that! A home user could always blame Microsoft but a company...) and if you wait for another stepping why not wait another 2-3 months for a MUCH better alternative from Intel - that is if you are a real Intel fanatic.
Razvan
- it's more expensive than T-Bird and with few exceptions slower;
- it's strongly unbalanced exactly like the old K6 line from AMD (I mean it "prefers" some applications);
- if you buy one right you'll get stucked: Intel wants to abandon Socket423 and P4 in less than a year. That's a short life, don't you think?
- about the SSE2 story: if you are interested only in high performance then you should look for other platforms like Alpha. The users of the 80x86 platform always put a big price on compatibility. Otherwise how do you explain that we are still working on 8086 compatible machines? SSE2 right now is NOTHING. My guess is that it will be important in 1 year but in 1 year you will have much better alternatives from Intel.
You may argue that P4 has a lot of potential. IMHO the architecture of P4 has a lot of potential but the P4 doesn't. You should wait at least for another stepping (right now it has 40 bugs, many of them without "workaround" - I wonder if companies will ever accept that! A home user could always blame Microsoft but a company...) and if you wait for another stepping why not wait another 2-3 months for a MUCH better alternative from Intel - that is if you are a real Intel fanatic.
Razvan