Anand: On Barcelona

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
What happened to Jack?
I've been gone from here for long...

Apparently he left because the mods won't ban MoronBatrix. Rob, Jack is the only thing keeping alot of folks coming back. Hell, he's the reason I'm here right now. Allowing Jack to leave because you don't want to ban this asshat is a pretty bad move dude.

but baronmatrix is our forum clown.. wouldnt it be stupid 2 ban him? he makes alot of us laugh
 
What happened to Jack?
I've been gone from here for long...

Apparently he left because the mods won't ban MoronBatrix. Rob, Jack is the only thing keeping alot of folks coming back. Hell, he's the reason I'm here right now. Allowing Jack to leave because you don't want to ban this asshat is a pretty bad move dude.

but baronmatrix is our forum clown.. wouldnt it be stupid 2 ban him? he makes alot of us laugh
 
What happened to Jack?
I've been gone from here for long...

Apparently he left because the mods won't ban MoronBatrix. Rob, Jack is the only thing keeping alot of folks coming back. Hell, he's the reason I'm here right now. Allowing Jack to leave because you don't want to ban this asshat is a pretty bad move dude.

but baronmatrix is our forum clown.. wouldnt it be stupid 2 ban him? he makes alot of us laugh
 
What happened to Jack?
I've been gone from here for long...

Apparently he left because the mods won't ban MoronBatrix. Rob, Jack is the only thing keeping alot of folks coming back. Hell, he's the reason I'm here right now. Allowing Jack to leave because you don't want to ban this asshat is a pretty bad move dude.

but baronmatrix is our forum clown.. wouldnt it be stupid 2 ban him? he makes alot of us laugh

how many times are you going to post this?
 
but baronmatrix is our forum clown.. wouldnt it be stupid 2 ban him? he makes alot of us laugh

how many times are you going to post this?

Wouldn't it be great if we could set up some kinda bot or something that would post that line in response to Baron everytime he said something?
 
How many baseball teams are there?
A lot but what does that have to do with anything?

How many CPU companies are there?
More than you think AMD, Intel, IBM, VIA, NEC, Motorola, to name a few

Or did you mean x86 processors AMD, Intel, and VIA

When you buy a VCR do you care if it's Sony or Panasonic?

Yes I do I acually avoid Sony products because of their proprietary everything attitude. Remember Betamax they were better than JVC's VHS for picture and sound quality but they cost a fortune. JVC licensed the VHS design to anybody and Betamax died a quick death.

So, no I am not an ardent devotee, I have two choices, I chose AMD.

Well actually you are either an ardent devotee of AMD or you have a deep loathing of Intel the net effect is the same and either way you have antipathy towards VIA.
 
Fun responses to many things in this thread...

1.) Baron, you say you can't be a fan of a company and that buying products is essentially the way you show support. I thought you loved the 4x4, but you didn't buy it...hmm...

2.) Actually, I try to stay away from Sony, since they're a pretty messed up company in terms of business ethics (same reason not to shop at Baron's true employer...Wal-mart). If they come out with an incredibly nice quality product, then sure, I might be interested. But apples to apples, all things considered, I won't pick Sony. That's personal preference, though. Currently there's no comparison like that with AMD and Intel. With Core 2, you ARE getting a much higher quality product, so the choice is clear. Hopefully Barcy makes things interesting.

3.) I can understand why Jack left. He wrote some of the most fantastic, in-depth, thought provoking technical posts. To write those and then have to post clean up posts to each of Baron's posts in order to protect innocent visitors with real questions was taxing, I'm sure (remember the best way to store a chip thread? Taking Baron's thoughts seriously could actually end up financially harming people).

4.) Penryn before Barcy should not happen unless Intel really wants to kill AMD. Considering Penryn vs Barcy actual tests and demos, Penryn seems leaps and bounds ahead of Barcy. But Intel's outselling AMD everywhere right now, there's no reason to launch a new product (until they push prices too low, of course). We should see Penryn launch the day after Barcy. AMD should just "launch" it now. We all know by now that when they "launch" any product, it means "in 3-6 months you may find one". That sounds in line with current projections :lol:

I've been around awhile (low post count, true, but check out that join date - don't be fooled though, it's not because I post really high quality posts infrequently...I post mediocre long posts infrequently), but I'll still kick around, no matter how many Barons, MMMs, Meltdowns, or other interesting and deluded people we get on the forums. Although, there's not much reason to poke around lately as silicon news is pretty dead for awhile. Plus, it's incredibly warm and sunny outside! Get out of the chair! :lol:
 
I miss Fugger. :twisted: No one was better at "proving" Intel was better than AMD by comparing a 4.0GHz P4 to a 1GHz Athlon. He actually put the B-man to shame. I doubt most of you remember him though.
 
I miss Fugger. :twisted: No one was better at "proving" Intel was better than AMD by comparing a 4.0GHz P4 to a 1GHz Athlon. He actually put the B-man to shame. I doubt most of you remember him though.
well in fact i do! :lol: :lol: :lol: along with MMM, 9-inch, Rettihsllub, and others...

those were the most hilarious times, where every single thread literally turns into "Intel roxorz" or "AMD roxorz" thread; where flamming literally became the only way to communicate... :lol: :lol: :lol:

EDIT: now i remember more clearly now. wasn't he the one posted a CPU-Z image with Intel P4 running at 4.0Ghz +, and said something like.. "see, I TOLD you! Intel is better than AMD"
 
EDIT: now i remember more clearly now. wasn't he the one posted a CPU-Z image with Intel P4 running at 4.0Ghz +, and said something like.. "see, I TOLD you! Intel is better than AMD"
Yep, that was him alright, along with saying that since he had one of the top rigs (Intel, of course) at such and such meaningless synthetic benchmark, so logically, Intel MUST be better than AMD.

For those that don't know, this was in the hot-iron days of Netburst when AMD was spanking Intel.
 
For those that don't know, this was in the hot-iron days of Netburst when AMD was spanking Intel.
If I remembered correctly, it was right before Conroe's debut. It happened around the time I joined this forum.

Those were some hilarious times. People here nowadays are all too educated and mature. :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
You have to admit though, Fugger did some pretty amazing things with the chips he got ahold of. He was definitely doing things that were like the old THG (pushing things to the limits and experimentation). Now, THG is a list of links to news articles other people wrote and a forum where the best are pushed out 🙁.
 
You have to admit though, Fugger did some pretty amazing things with the chips he got ahold of. He was definitely doing things that were like the old THG (pushing things to the limits and experimentation). Now, THG is a list of links to news articles other people wrote and a forum where the best are pushed out 🙁.
Oh, absolutely. I wasn't questioning his knowledge. He could overclock like a champ. He just had very peculiar view (read misinformed and pig headed), when it came to Intel vs AMD. Of course, it was somewhat understandable, since Intel gave him free stuff...