nukemaster :
I did not know that a charge pump was THAT inefficient since Maxim rates the ones they sell(add some caps and call it a day) pretty high.
Charging capacitors from a voltage source is only 50% efficient. In a boost pump though, that energy gets added to the source's voltage and for a voltage doubling charge pump, half of the total energy output is provided by the capacitor. If that half is 50% efficient, then overall efficiency becomes 75% under ideal conditions.
In the BX1000's case though, it is a voltage inverting charge pump, not a boost pump, so direct contribution from the source to output power does not apply. I should have been more specific. I have never really worked with charge pumps and the details skipped my mind. Also, APC's implementation here is cobbled up from a bunch of discrete diodes and transistors which loses about 4V, making efficiency that much worse - clearly a no-concern here.
Bottom line: if you are genuinely concerned with efficiency, use a magnetics-based switching converter. With modern micro-power switchers operating at frequencies beyond 1MHz, you can use inductors under 4.7uH which are nearly as small and inexpensive as capacitors without charge pumps' caveats and higher efficiency across a much broader input-output voltage range.
Historically, charge pumps came about to avoid using large and expensive inductors for low power supplies. Ironically, today's low-power switchers can use smaller inductors than those recommended in many charge pumps' reference design input EMI chokes.