[citation][nom]scook9[/nom]You clearly do not have any experience with the law......does not matter how much you paid for it, you could have even traded a kidney for it - if it was not obtained through legitimate means it is stolen property and you will not get any reimbursement or even a thank you when they seize it (which they could probably have the sheriff come and do). It is obviously Apple's intellectual and physical property. Sure someone stole it a few years ago and Apple may not have made a stink about it - that does not make it any less theirs.The fact that everyone is hating apple for this is pretty pathetic and shows how ignorant the majority of society really is....you can bet Apple is trying to identify who was in custody of this prototype when it went missing and will be firing them if they still work there. And I can't blame that at all for that.I am in no way a fan boy, had an ipod touch and stopped using it completely when I got my first android phone - that is my total involvement in Apple products. No I do not like them much as a company but in this case I have to take their side.Don't let fanboy hate blind you guys.....you can hate apple and still understand why they would be reacting this way.Is it also "evil" of Intel to block the selling of ES chips? Exact same thing....[/citation]
the moment someone comes to take something of mine i purchased, and had no idea it was stolen, and no proof it was stolen, and offering no compensation, it would be a fight to the death
[citation][nom]scook9[/nom]That left a taste of fanboy.....any ways.You think Apple would completely forge a document over something like this? If caught they would probably be fined a few hundred million to be made an example of.Altering the appearance of something (while I agree despicable) and completely fabricating a false document are not really comparable actions.And as for your remark about the law, you are welcome to right your representative to propose to have it reviewed and amended. I think it has been this way for a long time for a reason, it makes the most sense.Allow me to make an example for you: Some one steals your car. They sell it. You would not want to take your car back because the current "owner" paid for it and that is not fair to them?[/citation]
ok, lets look at it this way, you know for a fact that a car is stolen when you buy it, and only a moron wouldn't. lets equate this to... you are buying a older used computer for a linux box. after getting it, for a fair market price, cops come and tell you it was stolen, and you must give it up.
or lets go another way, you go to a garage sale, and find a silly fake ring that is 50 cents, you buy it because why not, later you find out that its real, so when taking it to get appraised, you are told its stolen, and you are getting NOTHING for winning the lottery
[citation][nom]scook9[/nom]If they can prove that it was never sold or given away (which they most likely could) then the only conclusion that could be drawn is that it was stolen.[/citation]
oh no, another conclusion is that they threw it away, but let an intern do it, and he didn't know it was prototype and needed to be thrown away in a special way, so he chucked it in a dumpster.
some one dumpster dove, and pulled it out.
now when you throw something away, its public property, and up for grabs.