Apple Granted SIM Connector Patent

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Status
Not open for further replies.
Seems asinine to patent this. I'm starting to believe Apple is in trouble AND they know it. They're out of fresh ideas and they're just trying to slow down the inevitable ...and thus they're grasping at straws such as this.
 
Oh joy another patent that will get used somehow to make Apple even more money through litigation and threats. Just what we all need!

And of course they are out of original ideas. Which means they actually have to do something besides slightly refreshing existing hardware since their lord and savior isnt there to berate them into their next product and wont be coming back to save their asses this time if they dont actually make something new and interesting without him.

Tick-Tock, Apple, Tick-Tock!
 
Last time I checked, we were still four months early for April 1st.

Considering how long ago standard SIMs have been around, I am a little surprised there would still be any sensible insertion/removal methods left to patent that haven't already been used elsewhere.

Wish companies that file large amounts of frivolous patents could get fined for wasting the PTOs' time... companies have better things to do than go through every possible but not necessarily practical ways of plugging things into each other just to bypass silly patents that are just a minor tweak to sometimes 50+ years old concepts.
 
1. "user pushes on a plunger rod to reject the SIM card"... eject?

2. First thing I thought of was a drive caddy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caddy_(hardware)
 
[citation][nom]halcyon[/nom]Seems asinine to patent this. I'm starting to believe Apple is in trouble AND they know it. They're out of fresh ideas and they're just trying to slow down the inevitable ...and thus they're grasping at straws such as this.[/citation]


Apple is in trouble? Check the recent windows phone/win 8 fail, and lets talk about trouble. Lets talk about having to adapt your entire new OS to fit a world that already moved ahead long ago, and still failing overall. Windows 8 is gorgeous, but is absolutely worthless in almost every other respect. I love having a "start" screen before having to switch back to "desktop" mode. What a calamity.

We all know Microsoft isn't going anywhere. We should also assume that Apple isn't going anywhere either. Them grabbing up patents is merely greed, and nothing else. A company being this lame isn't anything totally new.
Sure, if you smother out what all the other companies are doing/can do in the future you're sort of guaranteeing success, but it also forces people to innovate, and this is where I think Apple may be shooting themselves in the foot. I honestly think they're going to force other companies to innovate completely new products to work around all their patent BS and just might find themselves behind the curve because of it.
While I am a huge Apple fan, I also like the fact that there are alternatives if Apple every goes in a direction I don't like. I like that. I like the fact that I switched from Windows to Apple after a lifetime of using Windows, and can see the merits of both OS(and other OS's for that matter) just by being a bit open minded. I'm currently trying to do it with Win 8, but I'm not loving the experience.
Its just funny to me that so many people are waiting for Apple to fail. Like they're going to personally benefit from Apple going under. Like they actually have personal vendetta against the company. I'm guessing that all of the readers and posters here on Toms Hardware are at least of average intelligence, with the majority being well above the average mark. I find it hard to imagine so many smart people that are obviously tech savvy with a mind for the future are so concerned with making anti Apple post at every turn, with no real benefit other than feeling satisfied that you've fired off incognito style on the internet.
 
I'm an Apple fan as well. Generally, I appreciate their build quality/materials (withthe exception of the iP5). I love the MacBook Pro and Mac Pro. I'm no fanboy though. Opinionated, yes...fanboy...no. iOS is completely TIRED compared to ICS/JellyBean and the iPhone 5's use of soft/weak aluminium really left a sour taste in my mouth. Just no excuse for weak build materials on something as expensive as an iPhone. ...not to mention the eentsy-beentsy tiny little microscopic screens on the iPhone. I have a Note 2 and S3 so you can imagine why the iPhone seems so ...so...inadequate. Apple needs to correct the iPhone so it doesn't just appeal to folks that don't know any better, are tech-simple, or just want to impress others with their having money to waste just like Samsung needs to improve the screen resolutions and body material on their tablets (the painted plastic on the Galaxy Tab just looks cheap compared to the iPad and Asus' Transformer Prime/Infinity...does it not?)

Windows Phone? No thanks... Windows 8 ruined any opportunity I might give that. SurfaceRT or Pro? Not interested...at all, Android is doing quite well...why would I want or need to take the risk of buying a Surface? Anyone?
 
So you can take a well known and accepted method of inserting/ejecting a card. Apply it to another card. And get a patent?

We need to have a class action law suit against the patent office. Enough is enough. Apple. And others. Abuse a stupid system
 
I thought this had been done for ages?? I know my Nexus 7 has this exact same thing, where you insert the Micro-SIM into a little tray and push it into a slot on the side of the tablet, and then eject it by pushing a pin (or the included "ejector tool"... lol) into a little hole..Wouldn't this be considered "prior art" by Google/Asus? Even if the Nexus 7 wasn't the first device to feature this, it has definitely been done before Apple.. Patents like this should be thrown out... I'm highly against frivolous lawsuits, but I would love to see Apple get sued over this since they are the ones attempting to stifle innovation..
 


I don't have. Or want. Surface. But a tablet that plugs,and plays easily with active Directory, runs windows features, supports remote access etc. is big for business. Why integrate ios if you can plug and play windows? Its very good for companies and for admins. and for people remote and on call.

Its "lazy" but when I get called at 3am id love to be able to remote access on my tablet. or phone. And take care of it. From bed. Or being out. Instead I have to disconnect and haul my laptop everywhere.
 
Speaking of "plunger" ejection, that reminds me of my Toshiba CDT430 laptop: its PCMCIA slots did have "plungers" popping out when a card was inserted that you had to push on to eject cards. IIRC, my old Canon PowerShot camera also had a similar mechanism for its CompactFlash card.

Adapting an old mechanism to new card formats seems far too trivial and obvious to be patent-worthy.

Same goes for pop-in, pop-out type slots which are based on the same fundamental mechanism as push-on, push-off switches from 50+ years ago, you just use stronger springs and slap an appropriate caddy and contact fingers for the card on in place of the switch's button and electrical components.
 
And here is the answer why the US patents more and more frequently gets rejected around the world, the US PTO have started to loose credibility by allowing this kind of patents!
 
[citation][nom]rantoc[/nom]And here is the answer why the US patents more and more frequently gets rejected around the world, the US PTO have started to loose credibility by allowing this kind of patents![/citation]
That argument is as valid as saying Bill Gates not allowing Apple products to being in his household because Apple products suck.

Apple is capitalism done right, and they take advantage of everything like every other company does to maximize profit and slow down their competition. They have good lawyers, and no government policies are invincible to loopholes and their own faults. Unlike printing new currency bills and destroying all old bills to prevent or reduce counterfeiting, changing the patent system is like patching Java.

I'm surprised no one is complaining about Google, but I guess everyone here reads "non-bias" tech news.
 
Just start charging 10% of their current R&D (or cash reserves) per patent application. That should slow them down a little and give the little man a chance in hell!
 


I'm confused? You're saying his statement is extremely valid?
 
[citation][nom]Blessedman[/nom]Just start charging 10% of their current R&D (or cash reserves) per patent application. That should slow them down a little and give the little man a chance in hell![/citation]
The majority of patents being filed by non-trolls are defensive in nature with the companies having little to no interest in litigation or even actively pursuing licensing revenues.

I think the patent process needs to fork: an expedited process for defensive patents so companies can have their new "inventions" published to set prior art as protection against future commercial patents with similar claims (which they may still license to other companies seeking protection from patent vultures) and a thorough process for commercial patents to prevent patent extortion for trivial/obvious stuff.
 

Sorry, but the iPhone 3 (July 2008 release) had the stupid tray and eject tool too. Nexus 7 was only last year, so that's about 4 years after. That's the thing about patents, the process takes a long time. Now so many dumb patent requests may have some thing to do with that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom