News Apple's Base M3 SoC Reportedly Won't Increase CPU or GPU Core Count

Both M1 and M2 used the same process node (TSMC N5), which has gotten cheaper since the M1 shipped. TSMC's N3 node will be more expensive, so it's understandable they want to keep costs down on the base configuration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artk2219
While I'm not a fan of apple in any way I hope this isn't a sign of the entire line. It would be a shame for them to not be moving the architecture forward in any meaningful way.
Maybe it's Apple's version of tick tock? The M1 and M2 had roughly the same microarchitecture and process node, but generally more cores and faster clocks. If they improve the architecture and shrink the process node, in this generation, it won't matter if core counts are somewhat stagnant.

ARM's newly-announced X4 has 10-way dispatch, which is even wider than Apple's current P-cores:


The X4 still has a smaller reorder buffer than Apple's, but it's going big on caches and that's another one of Apple's traditional advantages.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: artk2219

TRENDING THREADS