Review Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 AIO Cooler Review: Unique, Affordable Performance

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
This seems like a top contender for the best 280mm AIO. Great job on Arctic's side of things. The only thing left to test is whether or not there will be more or less horror stories with them, as well as, how many are DOA and the longevity of each cooler.
 
I have one of their older 120 models (push pull) on an R7 1700 (non-x, but OCd to 3.8)- cools extremely well and is super quiet - I only hear it when 3D rendering (100% load for more than a few minutes).

This one in the review looks really nice as well. I wish more manufacturers would stop making their products look like action figure toys.
 
Last edited:
I'm using very good CM Nepton 140XL which is doing great job on my 3700x Ryzen but is pushing it's 6th year and time to change the cooler. Good price, easy and simple wiring and that little fan should make it a strong contender i intermediate bracket. Now just to find it in Europe. Is it already for sale in US ?
 
CountMike said:
I'm using very good CM Nepton 140XL which is doing great job on my 3700x Ryzen but is pushing it's 6th year and time to change the cooler. Good price, easy and simple wiring and that little fan should make it a strong contender i intermediate bracket. Now just to find it in Europe. Is it already for sale in US ?
Click to expand...

Should be available in Europe -- I'm pretty sure Arctic is a European company -- based in Germany maybe?
 
I looked back to compare this with my EVGA clc280 and something doesn't add up. The clc280 at full fans was only a 37 degree delta t, while this is 56. Was there a hardware change that wasn't mentioned? The hardware and software mentioned in the articles is the same.
 
Just installed this cooler a couple of days ago. Replaced a Corsair
Hydro Series H100i v2, and couldn't be happier! This cooler is everything the Corsair was not...... FAReasier to install, MUCH quieter, and keeps my Ryzen 2700X 7-10 degrees cooler across the board then the Corsair.

My advice is to buy one before Arctic realizes how good the product is, and jacks up the price!
 
Please fix the huge error in this article!

AM4 is NOT THREADRIPPER!

TR4, sTRX4 is THREADRIPPER.

I HOPE Arctic DOES release a version for THREADRIPPER. I would for SURE give this a go then!
 
  • Like
Reactions: nayuta
dbvandyke said:
Please fix the huge error in this article!

AM4 is NOT THREADRIPPER!

TR4, sTRX4 is THREADRIPPER.

I HOPE Arctic DOES release a version for THREADRIPPER. I would for SURE give this a go then!
Click to expand...
YES!!! I ordered Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 for my amd 3970x and i found this now (ALF already shipped ;_; )
 
I've been struggling to figure out a Mid tower case for this cooler to be place on the top ,maybe you can give me some ideas ? I'll be running Ryzen 9 3950x on a MSI 570 Unify , and have all 4 RAM slots populated . Haven't decided on the video card , but I won't be playing ( mostly virtual machines ) so nothing too fancy.

I'm currently looking at Fracktal Define S2 , maybe that will work. Is there anyone that has this cooler already in a mid tower case ?

Thanks
 
iloveme said:
I've been struggling to figure out a Mid tower case for this cooler to be place on the top ,maybe you can give me some ideas ? I'll be running Ryzen 9 3950x on a MSI 570 Unify , and have all 4 RAM slots populated . Haven't decided on the video card , but I won't be playing ( mostly virtual machines ) so nothing too fancy.

I'm currently looking at Fracktal Define S2 , maybe that will work. Is there anyone that has this cooler already in a mid tower case ?

Thanks
Click to expand...
You should start a thread in the Components section of the forum to ask this question. You will get better results asking there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: helper800
jpe1701 said:
I looked back to compare this with my EVGA clc280 and something doesn't add up. The clc280 at full fans was only a 37 degree delta t, while this is 56. Was there a hardware change that wasn't mentioned? The hardware and software mentioned in the articles is the same.
Click to expand...

Fk82JP95icXNrxcJakb4YZ-650-80.png

vs.
3EA2hQPSHfC4QYuMzQCepM-650-80.png

I'm a bit confused as well. I'm assuming the ambient temperature is about the same(office environment?).
 
In the review you stated “While the Liquid Freezer II 280’s 140mm fans are factory installed and managed with the same PWM power that controls the pump and auxiliary fan, we opted to disconnect the fans and run them independently for our tests, allowing for independent PWM cooling fan management while the pump remained powered at 100%.”

How were the fans disconnected and and connected to the motherboard to be run and managed independently? Could you expand a little on the advantages of doing it that way.
 
JC Hancock said:
In the review you stated “While the Liquid Freezer II 280’s 140mm fans are factory installed and managed with the same PWM power that controls the pump and auxiliary fan, we opted to disconnect the fans and run them independently for our tests, allowing for independent PWM cooling fan management while the pump remained powered at 100%.”

How were the fans disconnected and and connected to the motherboard to be run and managed independently? Could you expand a little on the advantages of doing it that way.
Click to expand...
The fans just plug into two headers on a splitter that's routed from the block to the radiator inside the sleeving on the tubing. So you can just disconnect the fans from that splitter and hook them up to a regular header if you like, though you'll likely need an extension, as the fans have pretty short cables (presumably to aid cable management). The fans it comes with are of excellent quality, incidentally. They have a Noctua-grade weight and feel to them and are very quiet. Pity the same can't be said of the 40mm fan on the pump.

As for the advantage of doing that, it allows you to control the pump speed and fan speed independently. By default, one PWM signal is responsible for the pump, VRM fan and both radiator fans, with no independent adjustment possible.
 
Admin said:
System builders with an aversion to RGB lighting who seek a liquid cooler with distinct attitude should put Arctic’s Liquid Freezer II 280 cooler on their short list.

Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 AIO Cooler Review: Unique, Affordable Performance : Read more
Click to expand...
Something has to be totally off... the fans for the 240 are 25mm thick. Those for the 280 are 27mm thick. The radiator itself is 38mm. So in total that's either about 63mm or 65mm - still you, however you managed it, make that a thickness of 69.9mm... and I cannot wrap my head around how you got that measurement.

So I can only assume that the data that you are supplying in your list of specifications is wrong or... well, it must be wrong.
What's up with that? How thick is it actually with the fans assembled to the radiator?
 
Eiion said:
Something has to be totally off... the fans for the 240 are 25mm thick. Those for the 280 are 27mm thick. The radiator itself is 38mm. So in total that's either about 63mm or 65mm - still you, however you managed it, make that a thickness of 69.9mm... and I cannot wrap my head around how you got that measurement.

So I can only assume that the data that you are supplying in your list of specifications is wrong or... well, it must be wrong.
What's up with that? How thick is it actually with the fans assembled to the radiator?
Click to expand...

Slight discrepancies in imperial to metric conversions and rounding. The official spec sheet is here: https://www2.arctic.ac/liquidfreeze...pec_Sheet_Liquid_Freezer_II_280_EN_LowRes.pdf

Which indicates that it should be 65mm by adding the fan and rad thickness - howeverthese could be rounded to the nearest whole number as well. For example, it could 65.3mm + 27.3mm which could technically round down as standalones but should add to 65.6, which if rounded at this point should be 66, not 65. This is just a speculation though. I assume since this was mfgd in a metric country the mm indicated on the spec sheet should be pretty exact.

Also the screws that hold the fans to the rad stand off from the surface at least two mm - maybe three. this additional number is not fan or rad width but would definitely add to the overall package width. You can see the screw offset below.

The 69.9 mentioned in this article is an exact conversion of 2.75 inches (and then rounded up to the nearest 10th mm) - in which the initial imperial value would have been rounded to the nearest .125 inches to keep with imperial measurement expectations for the USA - and then converted back to mm from there, which made the discrepancy even larger. Go with the manufacturers mm measurement, which is 65mm total and add at least two mm for the screw head offset.

Liquid_Freezer_II_280_G03.jpg
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom