Are the amd fx's cpus really that bad???

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

killer14321

Honorable
Sep 15, 2012
14
0
10,510
I dont want to know that they dont beat the i5s i know this intel performence is better but amd is more bang for the buck. what i want to know are they ok for gaming. not for anything else can they run bf3 at 1080 ultra setttings with decent fps?? or should i wait tell piledriver comes out?
 
im going to wait for pd to release not getting windows 8 cause it looks like crap its made for tablets not for pc and its going to flop like windows vista did. any sugstions on a good graphics card?
 

The absolute best you can afford. But bare minimum, for a 1080p gaming system today I'd want something on the 660 TI/7870 level. Although 7850 GTX 570/560 TIs, will get the job done too, you still want to go as high as you can afford.

And yea, I don't expect Windows 8 is going to be that successful either. A lot of people share our sentiment about the new Metro interface, while there seem to be workarounds to restore it to something resembling a classic mode, is going to result in a Vista-like embarrassment for Microsoft.

I found this:
http://www.howtogeek.com/107711/how-to-get-the-classic-start-menu-back-in-windows-8/

Basically you have to build your own classic mode. Its more work than should be necessary.
 
ima stick with windows 7 cause its boss. and i just got my first part time job and i make 600 a month so im trying to keep the tower under 600 hundred and i need a new monter so trying to keep it under 800
 
Hey, just for the sake of discussion, and because I don't have any friends nerdy enough to care, I'll share here. Now I know everyone always talks about how "bad" AMD is for video card drivers, Nvidia released an update the other day version
306.23. Its causing annoying problems! Every time I use the onscreen magnifier build into Win7, my monitors start flickering and crap.. I'm gonna have to do a rollback. :sarcastic:
 


Hell, I'm still using 295.73. I'm not a hardcore gamer anyway, so I just haven't had a reason to update, but from what I understand, the 29x.xx drivers were some of the best recent drivers from Nvidia, so I'll stick with what I have until I'm absolutely forced to update.
 

Yea, well I never followed driver stuff that much, but I figured may as well keep the most up to date drivers, the thing automatically checks anyway, thats the only automatic update feature I haven't turned off in Win7, but I may have to revisit that policy after that BS. Rolled back and rebooted, sho'nuff, the magnifier works properly again.

I probably will turn off the update thing, but I'm droppin a 7870 in here shortly, so the point is moot.
 
cpu:
fx 4170 or fx 6100
120
Graphics card:
160
Case:
RAIDMAX Super Hurricane ATX-248NWU Black / Blue Steel / Plastic ATX Mid Tower Computer Case
45
Psu:
RAIDMAX HYBRID 2 RX-630SS 630W ATX12V V2.2/ EPS12V SLI Ready CrossFire Ready Modular Power Supply
50
Ram:
Kingston HyperX 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1866
55
Hard drive:
Western Digital Caviar Green WD5000AZRX 500GB IntelliPower 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive
70
Optical drive:
20
Motherboard:
GIGABYTE GA-970A-UD3 AM3+ AMD 970 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD Motherboard
115
key board mouse:
25
monter:
Acer S220HQLAbd Black 21.5" 5ms LED Backlight Widescreen LCD Monitor 250 cd/m2 ACM 100,000,000:1 (1000:1)
130
790
thats just most the things ima wait a couple months for piledriver to see how good they are
 
Get a different power supply than a raidmax. They're junk. I'd look at a Corsair CX500v2 if you're on a tight budget, or a Corsair TX650v2 ideally.

Look at Caviar Blue hard drives if you want a WDC Hard drive.

I'd go Asus M5A97-970 over the Gigabyte one.. Reason.. brand preference purely to be fair.

Phenom II 965 over the FX-4170 or 6100 in my opinion.

Don't get more than 1600mhz rated RAM, 1866 isn't necessary.
 


I (and many others) don't use the magnifier but I'm sorry to hear you have an issue.
 

Lol, well.. I dunno if there were any problems other than that, mainly because I haven't really gamed since my 550 TI hit a wall of unacceptability with Skyrim (I decided to just upgrade the graphics card and not get bored with the games I have playing at unfavorable details). But, I use the magnifier a lot, its easier if I'm watching a movie or TV show I torrented to use change the episode or, its the poor mans remote control, so I don't have to get up and walk over to the computer, lol. I'm kinda blind without my glasses at a distance, they broke a couple months ago, thats another issue entirely that gets fixed when my Stafford loan pays out in about 2 weeks.

I rolled back the Nvidia drivers, that definitely was the problem.
 

BF3.png


7770 or 6850 push the same fps, way better than the 650, all 3 priced at $150 on egg

next step is the 6870, considerably better than the 336 core 560s $170

http://www.techspot.com/review/458-battlefield-3-performance/page5.html

aside from that, if your overclocking, 965= 6100 >> 4170, but all 3 will be bottlenecked at the gpu. If your not overclocking, knock the 6100 off and go with the 965.

Battlefield loves core count up to the gpu bottleneck.

2507
 
cpu:
fx 4170 or fx 6100
120
Graphics card:
SAPPHIRE 11188-22-20G Radeon HD 6950 2GB 256-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.1 x16 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video Card (OC Edition)
200
Case:
RAIDMAX Super Hurricane ATX-248NWU Black / Blue Steel / Plastic ATX Mid Tower Computer Case
45
Psu:
Rosewill Green Series RG630-S12 630W Continuous @40°C,80 PLUS Certified,
60
Ram:
Patriot Viper 3 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600
41
Hard drive:
Western Digital Caviar Green WD5000AZRX 500GB IntelliPower 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive
70
Optical drive:
20
Motherboard:
ASRock 970 EXTREME3 AM3+ AMD 970 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD Motherboard
90
776