Ask Christopher

[Christopher11]

Allright guys, I made a special topic for this particular theory in order to not confuse new members who are asking for help. ( bcuz they may not know this theory)

So now Im only posting things about our theory here, yet you're still acting like pieces of you know what.

just weaken the elsastic band on your throusers.

 

[frozenlead]

Why does a technical research group not have their own web site?

Oh...yeah, this one's not real.

+1 to post count.

 

[Axeon]

@MODS: Please lock this thread and IP ban OP. This is getting quite annoying. He was gone for a while and I thought he was banned, and now he's back. Coincidentally he posted he so called "power index" back in May last year, so he looks like an unusual Troll. 98% of the people here are OCers,etc and don't care about this "power index" stuff. Pleas ban the OP. Mainly because he is spreading false information and don't have any "solid" proof for his so called "power index".

Nice one, agreed let report and BAN this MOFO.

 

[Christopher11]

And you have nothing worth saying or reading, please do not bother posting.

Spoiler

What's the matter? if you dont like my thread - dont read it. this is my thread after all, and you go off topic. you're 41, you're prolly gonna die in like 20-25 years and you still didnt learn manners.

 

[Christopher11]

Why does a technical research group not have their own web site?

quotemsg]

We are working on it. As soon as we are done I inform you.

 

[Mousemonkey]

What's the matter? if you dont like my thread - dont read it. this is my thread after all, and you go off topic. you're 41, you're prolly gonna die in like 20-25 years and you still didnt learn manners.

Maybe, maybe not but either way my manners are a lot more polished than your grammar and spelling and as for your nonsensical topic, it's mindless drivel and therefore deserves all the derision being heaped upon it.

 

[Christopher11]

With this you do nothing else but break the rules of this forum.

I am really grateful that you pointed out my mistakes. I'll have have to work more on my grammar and spelling.

 

[cjl]

Here's an example that disproves your theory:

By this power index thing that you just pulled out of nowhere, a 3870 rates higher (3+8+7+0=18) than a 4850 (4+8+5+0=17). In what possible way would this be true? The 4850 uses more power and is faster than a 3870.

 

[Bluescreendeath]

With this you do nothing else but break the rules of this forum.
I am really grateful that you pointed out my mistakes. I'll have have to work more on my grammar and spelling.

You should also work on accumulating actual evidence before spouting illogical crap that misleads new people on the forums.

Here's an example that disproves your theory:

So, by this power index thing, a 3870 rates higher (3+8+7+0=18) than a 4850 (4+8+5+0=17). In what possible way would this be true? The 4850 uses more power and is faster than a 3870.

+1

Also, a 4770 < 4850
yet 4+8+5+0 = 17 and 4+7+7+0=18
A 4850 is faster than a 4770

 

[Christopher11]

You should also work on accumulating actual evidence before spouting illogical crap that misleads new people on the forums.



+1

Also, a 4770 < 4850
yet 4+8+5+0 = 17 and 4+7+7+0=18
A 4850 is faster than a 4770

Yeah thanks, this is why I made this thread.

You guys forgot, that I have already written about this issue.
You can look up my first thread.
It's not like Fx5950 Ultra is Better than, lets say a 260gtx with a turbocharger.


You cant compare a 2.0 litre engine of 1999 and 2008. In general that of 2008 will be much faster. But they both have the same power index. So the year must be considered.

it seems like there is a small supercharger included in the 4850 makin it faster than it's higher indexed counterpart. But let us do a small research on it.

 

[badge]

Here's an example that disproves your theory:

By this power index thing that you just pulled out of nowhere, a 3870 rates higher (3+8+7+0=18) than a 4850 (4+8+5+0=17). In what possible way would this be true? The 4850 uses more power and is faster than a 3870.

:lol: You should be banned for causing an unforseen means of psychological distress on children.

 

[Bluescreendeath]

Yeah thanks, this is why I made this thread.

You guys forgot, that I have already written about this issue.
You can look up my first thread.
It's not like Fx5950 Ultra is Better than, lets say a 260gtx with a turbocharger.


You cant compare a 2.0 litre engine of 1999 and 2008. In general that of 2008 will be much faster. But they both have the same power index. So the year must be considered.

it seems like there is a small supercharger included in the 4850 makin it faster than it's higher indexed counterpart. But let us do a small research on it.

negative. The ATI 4x00 cards all run on a variant of tesla technology, based on inverted APFSDS architecture. It's totally different from the mass driver technology used by Nvidia's gauss-based architecture. All ATI 4x00 cards use APFSDS architecture, so they can be compared quite adequately. The only difference is DDR, which can easily be taken into account via the data transfer mass ratio via simple multiplication.

You're still comparing apples with apples.

 

[Christopher11]

negative. The ATI 4x00 cards all run on a variant of tesla technology, based on inverted APFSDS architecture. It's totally different from the mass driver technology used by Nvidia's gauss-based architecture. All ATI 4x00 cards use APFSDS architecture, so they can be compared quite adequately. The only difference is DDR, which can easily be taken into account via the data transfer mass ratio via simple multiplication.

You're still comparing apples with apples.

Thanks, you just pointed out that memory is the thing which charges 4XXX series.

This will be really useful for further research.

 

[rewindlabs]

Wow...He also ran his mouth about the 9800gtx+ being a bad card because of the way the numbers add up

Are you serious? really? i mean really? addind the numbers of the card up on an index?

good lord...oh man that 3870 must be better than my gtx 260....should have bought it 🙁

Where in the hell are these moderators at? i mean seriously letting this troll run around and recommend *** on here is even worse than this thread...the mods here come out at night or what?

 

[Christopher11]

Wow...He also ran his mouth about the 9800gtx+ being a bad card because of the way the numbers add up

Are you serious? really? i mean really? addind the numbers of the card up on an index?

good lord...oh man that 3870 must be better than my gtx 260....should have bought it 🙁

Where in the hell are these moderators at? i mean seriously letting this troll run around and recommend *** on here is even worse than this thread...the mods here come out at night or what?

Nope

Gtx260 = new generation
Hd 3870 = old generation


gtx 260 = 2+6+0+ "x" turbocharger, which adds 11 points to the index.

 

[rewindlabs]

Either way there is no reason to make up some pointless little index when there are already benchmarks out there...you also have to factor in overclocking as well....which benchmarks cover...

Enough people already manage to buy the wrong thing as it is...

 

[Christopher11]

Either way there is no reason to make up some pointless little index when there are already benchmarks out there...you also have to factor in overclocking as well....which benchmarks cover...

Enough people already manage to buy the wrong thing as it is...

you mean the one who bought a 1024 mb 9400gt ? 😀

 

[edeawillrule]

Christopher11 do us all a favor and go away.
Go try to count the rocks in your head and see what number you come up with then.
Dunderhead

 

[Mousemonkey]

Christopher11 do us all a favor and go away.
Go try to count the rocks in your head and see what number you come up with then.
Dunderhead

+1

 

[rewindlabs]

Forget it...toms F**** up all of my posts...

 

[Christopher11]

Christopher11 do us all a favor and go away.
Go try to count the rocks in your head and see what number you come up with then.
Dunderhead

Only 17 yet so agressive. If you are as agressive in rl I think u should look like your head was cut on fire and put out with a fork lol.
Go away from my thread.

 

[edeawillrule]

Only 17 yet so agressive. If you are as agressive in rl I think u should look like your head was cut on fire and put out with a fork lol.
Go away from my thread.

Now look who is being aggressive.
Your spelling and sentence structure is pathetic and befitting of an 11 year old so your name matches you perfectly.
Regardless of whether your ridiculous theory makes any sense or not nobody is going to pay you any attention if they can't read what you're trying to say.

 

[rewindlabs]

That whole stereotype that most numbers will be your age or birth year etc is really looking true for you....

Edit: Nice Edeawillrule...it would seem we think alike *high five*

 

[randomizer]