Olle P :
I'm a bit disappointed with this review. It's not very deep in its presentation and analysis of the board, but spend lots of effort comparing two very different, seemingly arbitrarily built, computers. That "test" doesn't show anything with regards to this motherboard.
While I can't see this particular top end board being aimed at the "average market" I do agree that having a PCI-slot would be nice for those enthusiasts (like me) doing incremental upgrades to their computers.
There's no reason to replace a fully functioning non-critical part just because it's old.
I think it's safe to say that the majority of desktop PC users don't have a need for Wi-Fi and/or Bluetooth for their desktop PC.
I beg to differ. In a family house with a couple of desktop computers most of them will use WiFi. I'll happily pay an additional $20 or so to get WiFi with the motherboard.
elbert :
Fine motherboard with plenty of options for the average market. ...
Asrock ... lacks a single model with old school PCI.
Asrock ... lacks a single model with old school PCI.
There's no reason to replace a fully functioning non-critical part just because it's old.
spdragoo :
pjgowtham :
why " could have done without the wifi " in the cons?
But is that necessarily the norm? Sure, between the two of us my wife & I have 2 smartphones, 2 tablets, 2 Roku devices (1 box, 1 stick), 1 game console (Wii), & 3 PCs...but only 1 of those PCs is a desktop, & everything that could be hardwired (i.e. printer & Wii) is hardwired -- the Roku box is the WiFi-only version, & the Roku stick doesn't take Ethernet.
My brother-in-law has a similar situation: they have at least 3 tablets & 4 PCs, but even though 3 of their PCs are desktops they have a common computer room -- mainly because a) his sons' PCs are primarily used for e-schooling, & b) because they like having their own LAN party setup for the games they like to play together -- so their primary Wi-Fi usage is for their tablets, the laptop, their Wii, & their Roku box.