Asus a8n-sli deluxe (nvidia nForce4 chipset)
amd athlon 64 3500+ (2.2Ghz)
Corsair XMS 1GB PC3200 dual channel ram
Windows XP SP3
Hello all,
I'm not sure if this should be motherboards or memory.. it relates to both but here goes:
I have recently purchased another 1 GB stick of corsair ram (albiet slower than the xms pair I have already) and it seems to have no performance boost or similar performance as I cannot get the ram to run at the proper speeds. Note that while trying to run the 2 pairs I have, CPU-Z showed them at 100mhz instead of 200mhz (this was from auto settings in the BIOS, tried setting to DDR333 and it wasn't stable) The second pair i purchased was the same dual channel 2x512mb (closest matched to what I had already i could find). I realize not having an exact match is unadvised but a cheaper alternative than casting aside the original pair I had. (makes me want to cry remembering i paid about $170 for that XMS pair back in 2005)
>>My question is can this motherboard run 4 GB of ram (all 4 slots loaded) efficiently at the stated performance of the ram? I have read several times that the nForce 4 chipset has difficulties or cannot run 4GB of ram with slots loaded at the advertised performance levels but at a reduced rate of DDR333 instead of DDR400. Any truth to that?
I'm considering between these 2 pairs of memory, they seem to be the fastest rated out of the 2 GB pairs:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231032
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231047
Bottom line is would I be safe in buying 2 pairs and running 4 GB at their stated performance with the memory controller loaded? Or would I be better off just sticking with one pair of 2 GB? I do not need 4 GB badly enough to run it at reduced speeds (in terms of my memory usage). If i cannot run both pairs at the stated rate I'd rather stick with one pair at 2 GB.
Thanks!
amd athlon 64 3500+ (2.2Ghz)
Corsair XMS 1GB PC3200 dual channel ram
Windows XP SP3
Hello all,
I'm not sure if this should be motherboards or memory.. it relates to both but here goes:
I have recently purchased another 1 GB stick of corsair ram (albiet slower than the xms pair I have already) and it seems to have no performance boost or similar performance as I cannot get the ram to run at the proper speeds. Note that while trying to run the 2 pairs I have, CPU-Z showed them at 100mhz instead of 200mhz (this was from auto settings in the BIOS, tried setting to DDR333 and it wasn't stable) The second pair i purchased was the same dual channel 2x512mb (closest matched to what I had already i could find). I realize not having an exact match is unadvised but a cheaper alternative than casting aside the original pair I had. (makes me want to cry remembering i paid about $170 for that XMS pair back in 2005)
>>My question is can this motherboard run 4 GB of ram (all 4 slots loaded) efficiently at the stated performance of the ram? I have read several times that the nForce 4 chipset has difficulties or cannot run 4GB of ram with slots loaded at the advertised performance levels but at a reduced rate of DDR333 instead of DDR400. Any truth to that?
I'm considering between these 2 pairs of memory, they seem to be the fastest rated out of the 2 GB pairs:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231032
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231047
Bottom line is would I be safe in buying 2 pairs and running 4 GB at their stated performance with the memory controller loaded? Or would I be better off just sticking with one pair of 2 GB? I do not need 4 GB badly enough to run it at reduced speeds (in terms of my memory usage). If i cannot run both pairs at the stated rate I'd rather stick with one pair at 2 GB.
Thanks!