[quotemsg=11488295,0,964340]The HD8180, while not winning any awards, should be capable of playing older games at the lower settings, and much better than Atom GPU, of course it would have been nice if ASUS had various CPU options, mainly for the graphics[/quotemsg]
The bay trail atom will have the HD4000 GPU. While also nothing to brag about, the HD4k will play fairly recent games at low settings and around 720p. It doesn't look like the 8180 will have much of an advantage in the A4-1200. (TBH, they're probably pretty equivalent) Here is a review of the more-powerful A6-1460, which is a scaled up version of the A4-1200: http://www.umpcportal.com/2013/05/amd-temash-is-official-our-test-results-and-summary-too/ The A6 has the HD8250 GPU, which is a good 2x more powerful than the 8180 in the A4-1200, is about twice what the HD4000 delivers--so I wouldn't think that the 8180 to delivery any better performance than the HD4k. The benefit to bay trail is that it has much more advanced power-saving features compared to the A4. Don't get me wrong, I'm not some Intel fanboy or shill--on the contrary, I'm hoping AMD's market share improves in the very fast-paced mobile markets. But the A4-1200 is not the answer.
This is a funny situation to me. Netbooks were mostly a flop (and were probably the sole reason why the Atom line got a very bad reputation). They were incredibly slow, underpowered, short on storage, and didn't even have that great of battery life. Fast forward 4 years, and the same thing is true, only manufacturers are calling them "ultraportables" and offer slightly more storage space. There's virtually no difference between this ASUS X102BA, and the original ASUS EEE PC line. Still very low-end components, only now there's a touch screen. Netbooks were a flop last time. Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different outcome--what's that called again? Oh yeah, insanity.