Asus Fuses Together 2 GeForce GTX 285's

Status
Not open for further replies.
(GTX 285)2+heat sync = top of the line
($449.99)2+ 80~ = 978~

i think we will see a single chip gpu out late this year, hope we find out soon
 
Wider memory bus on already a huge card I'll give asus props on that but that's just a gluttonous card to see. Wonder why asus does these extreme custom cards sometimes.
 
[citation][nom]maddogoo9[/nom]I didn't know they still made VHS taps.[/citation]


Nope they never did.... they made tapes though 😛
 
[citation][nom]maddogoo9[/nom](GTX 285)2+heat sync = top of the line($449.99)2+ 80~ = 978~i think we will see a single chip gpu out late this year, hope we find out soon[/citation]

whoaps Heatsink*
 
[citation][nom]JumpKickJoe[/nom]Nope they never did.... they made tapes though 😛[/citation]

you guys are ruthless today 😛
 
im surprised they named it the gtx 295 still. especially considering they want to avoid being slapped down by nvidia for not making the "gtx 295" reference. they should have named it something else. like... "gtx 285x2" haha, im sure ati wouldnt mind toooo much.
 
[citation][nom]HundredIslandsBoy[/nom]Okay, they just upped the ante. So now it's a race between XFX and EVGA to fuse THREE GTX 285s together, a triple wide video card with it's power supply and power cord too?[/citation]
XFX and EVGA aren't they type to make custom cards it's up to sparkle, Galaxy, Gigabyte to do that work.
 
[citation][nom]thepinkpanther[/nom]wanna see quad 285 sli benchmark, with a 5+ ghz i7...[/citation]
Do you happen to have a handy 3,000$ donation you would like to give to TH? lol
 
[citation][nom]neon neophyte[/nom]im surprised they named it the gtx 295 still. especially considering they want to avoid being slapped down by nvidia for not making the "gtx 295" reference. they should have named it something else. like... "gtx 285x2" haha, im sure ati wouldnt mind toooo much.[/citation]

Actually humorous. 😛

But seriously, it IS a GTX 295, because remember that the normal 295 ALSO HAS "The GPUs themselves, one on each PCB, have all the 240 shader processors enabled..."

The original article is even worse, implying that some of the 240 cores on the 295 are disabled, even though the GPUs in the 295 are physically the same 55nm GPU that's in the 285 and the 275. Correct me someone if I'm wrong...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.