[citation][nom]neon neophyte[/nom]im surprised they named it the gtx 295 still. especially considering they want to avoid being slapped down by nvidia for not making the "gtx 295" reference. they should have named it something else. like... "gtx 285x2" haha, im sure ati wouldnt mind toooo much.[/citation]
Actually humorous. 😛
But seriously, it IS a GTX 295, because remember that the normal 295 ALSO HAS "The GPUs themselves, one on each PCB, have all the 240 shader processors enabled..."
The original article is even worse, implying that some of the 240 cores on the 295 are disabled, even though the GPUs in the 295 are physically the same 55nm GPU that's in the 285 and the 275. Correct me someone if I'm wrong...