[citation][nom]tokencode[/nom]Ummm Intel is "much much superior"[/citation]
Superior in some features but not others. AMD had 6Gbps SATA well before Intel, and when they did it, they made EVERY port 6Gbps, not just 2. They also had USB 3.0 integrated into their chipset before Intel. Intel, however, had SSD caching before AMD, but with new SSD caching drives including software that peforms just as well, hardware is no longer necessary for that function, making Intel's feature irrelevant. Also, even with all of these new features, AMD's chipsets were far more stable than the initial Sandy Bridge chipsets. AMD is the platform king. Intel just makes fast x86 CPU's.
Now as far as these motherboards go, the Intel ones represent the top-of-the-line for Intel, but only the mainstream middle-cost entries for AMD. Very few APU's are purchased for full-ATX, and ASUS probably has the sales figures to back that up. Many customers won't be putting a 69/7900 series video card in one of these either, and Crossfire support is just a sales point on a spec sheet. I would bet money that many customers would never put more than one video card in one of these boards, so microATX is an appropriate form factor. In fact, I would prefer to see more options for FM2 in mini-ITX, as ASUS and Asrock were the only companies producing mITX boards for FM1. I'd like to see more companies offering them for better competition. Those Lian-Li mITX cases make for very capable mITX towers where you could still put faster desktop drives and a single video card in, if you wanted to.