I'm in the US, putting together a new build and looking for 2400 64GB memory kits, since I do a lot of multi-tasking, lots of open windows and a lot of open Chrome tabs, graphics and video editing plus virtualization. On my older system I currently have 32GB but now and then that gets pegged.
CPU: i7-6800K (5th gen Broadwell-E, 28 lanes) Fry's with email promo code 8/29-8/30/2016 for $388
CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-U14S
MB: ASUS X99-A II, PCI-e 3.0
Optical: LG Blu-Ray HL-DT-ST BD-RE BH16NS40 1.03-A0, plus ASUS DRW-24B3ST
Memory: 64 GB for virtual machines, plus slightly less then a zillion open Chrome tabs, and a lot of multi-taking, multiple open windows
Monitors: Main - HP 2511x (HDCP), secondary - Acer H243H (unknown HDCP support); both do HDMI, DVI, and VGA
Power Supply: Corsair HX-750 modular
Case: CoolerMaster HAF 932 I've had a few years, with USB 3.0 up top. Hopefully it will fit okay.
I'm sticking religiously to ASUS's QVL list for that MB. Two 64GB options stand out.
I'll probably do no overclocking since I don't want to affect the system longevity. I need to hang onto my Window 7 until it officially goes unpatched in 2020. M$ is being obnoxiously aggressive about forcing people to Windows 10, even earlier with the newer CPU generations.
1. G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 Series 64GB (8 x 8GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 2400 (PC4 19200) Memory Kit Model F4-2400C15Q2-64GRK
DDR4 2400 (PC4 19200)
Timing 15-15-15-35
Cas Latency 15
Voltage 1.2V
2. CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 64GB (4 x 16GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 2400 (PC4 19200) Desktop Memory Model CMK64GX4M4A2400C14
DDR4 2400 (PC4 19200)
Timing 14-16-16-31
Cas Latency 14
Voltage 1.2V
I like G.Skill and wish they made 2400 4x16GB kit with similar specs to Corsair's but they don't.
I've read that 4 sticks is better than 8. However, I do have a Broadwell-E which I think is supposed to have a slightly beefier memory controller, and it does support 2400.
At this point, I'm leaning towards the Corsair kit because of the 4 sticks vs 8 for G.Skill, and, the CL of 14, vs. 15. At Newegg, there's just a $25 price differential.
I'm looking for comments and suggestions, and which would be the "safer" bet, especially if anyone's used either of those two kinds in an ASUS X99 board.
Thanks,
Mark
CPU: i7-6800K (5th gen Broadwell-E, 28 lanes) Fry's with email promo code 8/29-8/30/2016 for $388
CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-U14S
MB: ASUS X99-A II, PCI-e 3.0
Optical: LG Blu-Ray HL-DT-ST BD-RE BH16NS40 1.03-A0, plus ASUS DRW-24B3ST
Memory: 64 GB for virtual machines, plus slightly less then a zillion open Chrome tabs, and a lot of multi-taking, multiple open windows
Monitors: Main - HP 2511x (HDCP), secondary - Acer H243H (unknown HDCP support); both do HDMI, DVI, and VGA
Power Supply: Corsair HX-750 modular
Case: CoolerMaster HAF 932 I've had a few years, with USB 3.0 up top. Hopefully it will fit okay.
I'm sticking religiously to ASUS's QVL list for that MB. Two 64GB options stand out.
I'll probably do no overclocking since I don't want to affect the system longevity. I need to hang onto my Window 7 until it officially goes unpatched in 2020. M$ is being obnoxiously aggressive about forcing people to Windows 10, even earlier with the newer CPU generations.
1. G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 Series 64GB (8 x 8GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 2400 (PC4 19200) Memory Kit Model F4-2400C15Q2-64GRK
DDR4 2400 (PC4 19200)
Timing 15-15-15-35
Cas Latency 15
Voltage 1.2V
2. CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 64GB (4 x 16GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 2400 (PC4 19200) Desktop Memory Model CMK64GX4M4A2400C14
DDR4 2400 (PC4 19200)
Timing 14-16-16-31
Cas Latency 14
Voltage 1.2V
I like G.Skill and wish they made 2400 4x16GB kit with similar specs to Corsair's but they don't.
I've read that 4 sticks is better than 8. However, I do have a Broadwell-E which I think is supposed to have a slightly beefier memory controller, and it does support 2400.
At this point, I'm leaning towards the Corsair kit because of the 4 sticks vs 8 for G.Skill, and, the CL of 14, vs. 15. At Newegg, there's just a $25 price differential.
I'm looking for comments and suggestions, and which would be the "safer" bet, especially if anyone's used either of those two kinds in an ASUS X99 board.
Thanks,
Mark