compulsivebuilder :
You may find that there are only 8 lanes wired to that socket. Just because it is a x16 socket (necessary to allow physically plugging in a graphics card) doesn't mean that there are 16 lanes wired to it. If they did only wire 8 lanes to it, it would make their work simpler in terms of changing from one x16 to two x8 - they'd merely have to switch the 8 lanes.
The manual does state explicitly: "In single VGA card mode, use the PCIe 2.0 x16_1 slot (navy blue) for a PCI Express x16 graphics card to get better performance." - top of page 2-13.
However, you may find that x8 is sufficient to run your 6950 fast enough. It's certainly worth trying.
There definitely is some sharing between resources on that board - you can find it documented on page 2-13 on the manual (in English). The first two graphics slots share with the USB3 controller and the on-board graphics; other than the USB3, that shouldn't trouble you.
The x1 slots do not share with each other, however - the first one shares with the SATA controller and the first PCI slot, while the second one shares with the 1394 controller (that almost no one uses), USB3 1234 point, and the third graphics slot (that you won't be using).
I get the impression (although it's not stated explicitly) that you can only use the second PCIe x1 if you don't use the USB3 1234 - you might want to investigate that, if USB3 is important to you and you must use both x1 slots. I'd be tempted to drop the Xonar card and use the on-board audio rather than sacrifice USB3.
What an excellent answer - it helps a lot. I did read the manual cover to cover and you are right it suggests using the graphics card in the first PCI-E slot for best efficiency - whatever that means.
The confusion lies in that Asus calls the second PCI-E slot out as a PCI-E x 16 lanes and then says it goes to 8 lanes if the first slot is occupied. Therefore, one would rationally come to the conclusion that if the first PCI-E x 16 slot is not occupied that the second PCI-E slot would operate at a full 16 lanes - right?
So let me ask the question: I have these three cards to install, what is the best configuration?
1. XFX 6950 (would prefer to use a single PCI-E x 16 slot)
2. Asus Xonar Dx 7.1 sound card - it needs only a PCI-E x1 slot
3. Hauppauge 2250 HDTV card - it needs only a PCI-E x1 slot
A second configuration alternative would be this: what if I put the 6950 in the first slot (which covers the first PCI-E x 1 slot) and then put the Asus Xonar in the second PCI-E x 1 slot and the Hauppauge 2250 in the last (the black) PCI-E x 4 slot (which theoretically would take a third video card). Do you guys think that would be a more efficient setup?
since the first PCI-E x 16 slot does not share bandwidth with the third (the black) PCI-E x 4 slot and the second PCI-E x 1 slot shares only with the black third PCI-E x 4 slot, then it should work right?
The third alternative configuration would be to put the 6950 in the first PCI-E x 16 slot and put one of the cards in the second PCI-E x 16 (which goes to PCI-E x 8) slot and the third card in the black PCI-E x4 slot. Would this alternative be better?
What does it mean when the manual says that the USB 3.0 controller is "shared" with the first PCI-E x 16 slot? If I put the 6950 in the first PCI-E slot, the USB 3.0 plugs will still work right? And will they USB 3.0 plugs work at full speed?
Also, what does it mean that the second PCI-E x 16 slot is "shared" with the USB 1234? Does USB 1234 stand for four USB 3.0 plug-in outlets? If I put the 6950 in the second PCI-E x 16 slot will the USB 3.0 still function at full speed?
It is difficult to understand what Asus means by "shared" bandwidth connections. Does this mean that the "shared" connections will function but not as well or does it mean that using one eliminates the use of another?
Thanks again for your help. I know that this is not as sexy as posting in the "New Build" section, but I really need some help to understand the Asus manual's terminology.